2020
DOI: 10.2196/16534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Cognitive Functioning on Powered Mobility Device Use: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Abstract: Background Power mobility devices (PMD) are critical to achieving independent mobility and social participation for many individuals who have trouble walking. Provision of PMDs is complex, with cognitive functioning expressed by clinicians as a major concern. Even if PMD use can be predicted by the level of cognitive functioning, outcome tools used to assess readiness do not consider how cognitive functioning may affect PMD use. Objective The specific a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, number of studies suggest that subjective variables like cognitive and emotional development, mood, attention, fatigue, and stress are related to performance. 16,38,[46][47][48] The above-mentioned factors were not explored in the current study, thus future research on the impact of any subjective variables on PW mobility in DCP is strongly encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, number of studies suggest that subjective variables like cognitive and emotional development, mood, attention, fatigue, and stress are related to performance. 16,38,[46][47][48] The above-mentioned factors were not explored in the current study, thus future research on the impact of any subjective variables on PW mobility in DCP is strongly encouraged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chronological age of the participants showed no significant correlations with PW mobility performance. This might emphasize the importance to consider many other factors like cognitive and intellectual abilities 38 , readiness to drive the wheelchair and motivation levels 22 , training methods and opportunities 39 when assessing PW driving competences. The wide range in PW mobility experience and age, the small number of participants, and the lack of other abovementioned variables limit to an extent the interpretation of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other key issues agreed to be incompatible with continuing PMD use followed a similar theme of maintaining safety, including volitional misuse such as speeding or using the device as a weapon to bump others, substance overuse, failing to learn from errors, difficulty stopping and repeated incidents [ 48 ]. The guidelines developed by Mortenson, Miller [ 48 ], described practical, measurable behaviours for assessment, however isolating the underlying impairments, particularly when cognitive or visual in origin, can also assist with the application of appropriate interventions as outlined in subsequent studies [ 46 , 49 , 50 ]. In the current study, cognitive and visual impairments were alluded to by nurses in the incident reports, labelled as reduced attention, information processing, reaction time, insight, memory recall, judgement, and spatial awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure rigor this scoping review adhered to the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement’. The study protocol was registered a priori with the International Prospective Register of systematic reviews, (PROSPERO CRD42019118957) and a protocol was published [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%