1986
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.7_783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Coke Layer Collapse Phenomenon on Burden Distribution at the Top of Blast Furnace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…151,152) All companies developed bell-less burden distribution models in order to take advantage of the high flexibility of bell-less systems in control of burden distribution. 153,154) Using one such model, Kajiwara et al 155) showed that flat charging, which bell-MA charging systems cannot achieve, is possible with bell-less blast furnaces.…”
Section: Bell-less Charging Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…151,152) All companies developed bell-less burden distribution models in order to take advantage of the high flexibility of bell-less systems in control of burden distribution. 153,154) Using one such model, Kajiwara et al 155) showed that flat charging, which bell-MA charging systems cannot achieve, is possible with bell-less blast furnaces.…”
Section: Bell-less Charging Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ore is charged and superimposed on the coke layer surface, the coke surface layer part collapses as it is subject to the loading force. [5][6][7] Little coke layer collapse occurs by charges up to the second rotation, but by charges of the third rotation, the coke layer is greatly scraped, and the collapsing rate increases as the coke flat part increases. This is because when the ore falling angle (q) is reduced, the ore falling trajectory approaches closer to perpendicularity, and the ore falling impact force increases.…”
Section: Effects Of Falling Trajectory On Burden Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under high O/C operation associated with an increase of pulverized coal ratio, it is essential to control coke layer collapse and formation of mixed layer, [5][6][7] and properly maintain the gas flow inside the furnace. In Kobe Steel's bell-less system shown in left figure, flat parts are formed for both ore and coke in the peripheral region to suppress layer collapse, and the thickness ratio of ore to coke shown in right figure is smoothed on peripheral regions, and by coke center charging, 8) the inversed-V cohesive zone is intended to be formed.…”
Section: Effects Of Falling Trajectory On Burden Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the actual blast furnace, the coke layer thickness after collapse cannot be measured because the coke layer is covered with ore layer. Since many experimental studies have been carried out to investigate the coke collapse and clarify dominant factors [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Some studies have used numerical method like Discrete Element Method (DEM) [7] for better understanding of the phenomena involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%