2002
DOI: 10.1039/b107719h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of collision energy on the dynamics of the reaction O(1D) + CH4(X1A1) → OH(X 2Π) + CH3(X 2A2″)

Abstract: We studied the effects of collision energy (ET) on the dynamics of the title reaction using the quasiclassical trajectory method on an analytical triatomic potential energy surface we had derived for this system. We compared the dependence of the scalar and two-vector properties of the reaction on ET with experimental data and obtained a quite good agreement. The results can be explained in terms of the coexistence of two microscopic reaction mechanisms: insertion and abstraction. The former mechanism is the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly evident for E c = 0.5 eV and appears to be consistent with the existence of two main microscopic mechanisms found in QCT calculations. 4,24,36,37 Similar trends were obtained for the other rotational distributions, OH(v = 1-3, j ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly evident for E c = 0.5 eV and appears to be consistent with the existence of two main microscopic mechanisms found in QCT calculations. 4,24,36,37 Similar trends were obtained for the other rotational distributions, OH(v = 1-3, j ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…[4][5][6] The CH 3 OH reaction intermediate can be formed rather easily via insertion of O( 1 D) into a C-H bond of methane. 4,6,24,36,37 The particular importance of the CH 3 + OH channel (which has a kinematics nearly identical to reactants) is probably due to the fact that the other channels are less exoergic or present a barrier with respect to CH 3 OH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classical barrier height lays around 13-14 kcal/mol (or 9-10 kcal/mol when the zero-point energy is included). Several dynamics investigations, using quasi-classical trajectories (QCT) 10,16 or reduced-dimensionality quantum models, [5][6][7][8]13,14 have been reported, and the calculated kinetic behaviors and product state distributions are generally in good agreement with experimental findings. 22 In addition, the modespecific reactivity has been under scrutiny using reduceddimensionality quantum scattering approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In the other words, umbrella-mode excitation of CH 4 was partially preserved in the analogous nuclear motion of the CH 3 product, suggesting a spectator behavior of the CH 3 moiety in the reaction. 10 This view seems in keeping with a noninverted umbrella excitation of CH 3 products found experimentally 23 for the ground-state reagents. On the other hand, the concept of adiabaticity has its root on the relative time scales of nuclear motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation