1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0176-1617(11)80083-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of compatible solutes on soluble enzymes from desiccation-tolerant Sporobolus stapfianus and desiccation-sensitive Sporobolus pyramidalis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because little trehalose was found in these transgenics, these authors propose that trehalose must prevent cell damage rather than alter osmotic potential. The third major line of evidence stems from in vitro studies showing that these molecules either reduce the loss of enzyme activity or preserve membrane structure during desiccation or in saline solutions (Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984a;Schwab and Gaff, 1990;Mamedov et al, 1991;Colaco et al, 1992). The concentrations of these exogenously added compounds needed to obtain a significant degree of protection are often quite high (200-500 mM Pro; Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984b;Schwab and Gaff, 1990) compared with what some plants produce.…”
Section: B Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because little trehalose was found in these transgenics, these authors propose that trehalose must prevent cell damage rather than alter osmotic potential. The third major line of evidence stems from in vitro studies showing that these molecules either reduce the loss of enzyme activity or preserve membrane structure during desiccation or in saline solutions (Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984a;Schwab and Gaff, 1990;Mamedov et al, 1991;Colaco et al, 1992). The concentrations of these exogenously added compounds needed to obtain a significant degree of protection are often quite high (200-500 mM Pro; Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984b;Schwab and Gaff, 1990) compared with what some plants produce.…”
Section: B Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third major line of evidence stems from in vitro studies showing that these molecules either reduce the loss of enzyme activity or preserve membrane structure during desiccation or in saline solutions (Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984a;Schwab and Gaff, 1990;Mamedov et al, 1991;Colaco et al, 1992). The concentrations of these exogenously added compounds needed to obtain a significant degree of protection are often quite high (200-500 mM Pro; Pollard and Wyn Jones, 1979;Crowe et al, 1984b;Schwab and Gaff, 1990) compared with what some plants produce. NaCl-stressed rice, for example, has been reported to accumulate 8 to 12 jumol Pro g" 1 dry weight (Mali and Mehta, 1977), which might not produce the necessary molarity in the cell unless it is concentrated in a specific compartment.…”
Section: B Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proline and quaternary ammonium compounds are key osmolytes, which help plants to maintain the cell turgor (Weinberg et al 1982, Huang et al 2000. Moreover, there is an additional evidence that these compatible solutes are accumulated in plants at high concentrations to help in alleviating inactivation of the enzymes or loss in membrane integrity due to a water deficiency (Schwab and Gaff 1990). Sucrose, as a member of the sugar family, is thought to function as a typical osmoprotectant, stabilising cellular membranes and maintaining turgor (Mundree et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that the hydroxyl constituents of sugars may replace the hydration shell around membranes and thus prevent structural damage as water is removed (10,11). In addition, sucrose has been shown to protect soluble enzymes from salt-induced damage in vitro (32). The presence of a larger oligosaccharide along with sucrose may enhance protection still further by favoring vitrification rather than crystallization (6,9,17,33,35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%