2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cooling rate on activity of ionotropic glutamate receptors in brain slices at hypothermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Efflux of K + ions from neurons beginning at 27 ºC does not end further and can lead to a significant decrease of membrane potential level under further cooling or just in a certain time course (Aihara et al 2001). Against depolarization shift, the drop of spike amplitude takes place (Fig.2), which is confirmed by earlier investigations (Mednikova et al,2002;Mokrushin et al, 2014;Volgushev et al,2004) and the destructive intracellular processes are triggered (Hochachka, 1986;Ivanov, 2004). But even a small depolarization for potential-dependent K + channels is quite enough to open ever more (Adams et al 1982), causing further increase of K + efflux from the cell and further depolarization shift (Aslanidi, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Efflux of K + ions from neurons beginning at 27 ºC does not end further and can lead to a significant decrease of membrane potential level under further cooling or just in a certain time course (Aihara et al 2001). Against depolarization shift, the drop of spike amplitude takes place (Fig.2), which is confirmed by earlier investigations (Mednikova et al,2002;Mokrushin et al, 2014;Volgushev et al,2004) and the destructive intracellular processes are triggered (Hochachka, 1986;Ivanov, 2004). But even a small depolarization for potential-dependent K + channels is quite enough to open ever more (Adams et al 1982), causing further increase of K + efflux from the cell and further depolarization shift (Aslanidi, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The cortical temperature was changed before each recording. The change in cortical temperature, the interval, and the average rate of temperature change between two recordings were 3.7 ± 1.5 • C, 4.2 ± 2.9 min, and 1.6 ± 1.6 • C/min, respectively, in Experiments 1 and 3, 3.0 ± 0.2 • C, 6.1 ± 3.7 min, and 0.6 ± 0.2 • C/min, respectively, in Experiments 2 and 4, and 9.0 ± 0.3 • C, 10.7 ± 8.6 min, and 1.1 ± 0.4 • C /min, respectively, in Experiments 5-7 (Mokrushin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thermal Control Devicementioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, deep hypothermia (below 18°C) results in suppression of long-term potentiation (LTP), the neuroplastic process by which efficiency of synaptic transmission is upregulated via coincident bursts of high-frequency stimulation between neurons. [13,27] Taken with the behavioral data, this suggests that mild TH for long durations is not inherently harmful to natural plastic processes; however, given the risk of impairing LTP, caution should be taken when cooling to greater depths or durations. In addition, these limited studies are in naïve animals, and they do not include the study of other pharmacological agents that are often given concurrently with TH, which may potentially impact plastic processes.…”
Section: Effects Of Hypothermia In Naïve Animalsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, TH may directly impact repair by impeding such processes (e.g., glutamatergic neurotransmission). [13] Indirect effects are also expected. For example, a highly neuroprotective cooling protocol would likely diminish the need for repair.…”
Section: Hypothermia and Neuroprotectionmentioning
confidence: 98%