2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Core Cross-Linking and Shell Composition of Polymeric Micelles on Immune Response and Their Interaction with Human Monocytes

Abstract: Block copolymer micelles have received increasing attention in the last decades, in particular for their appealing properties in nanomedicine. However, systematic investigations of the interaction between polymeric micelles and immune cells are still rare. Therefore, broader studies comparing the structural effects remain inevitable for a comprehensive understanding of the immune response and for the design of efficient, nonimmunogenic delivery systems. Here, we present novel block copolymer micelles with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results were comparable to other studies using amphiphilic polymers of PEG and other fatty acids or polymers. 47,48 The polymeric micelles did not influence cell morphology (SEM analysis). In addition, the hemocompatibility of the polymeric micelles was assessed using human blood, as it is a critical parameter before regulatory approval.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Those results were comparable to other studies using amphiphilic polymers of PEG and other fatty acids or polymers. 47,48 The polymeric micelles did not influence cell morphology (SEM analysis). In addition, the hemocompatibility of the polymeric micelles was assessed using human blood, as it is a critical parameter before regulatory approval.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The polymer micelles were formed from an amphiphilic block copolymer which consists of a hydrophobic butyl acrylate copolymer (PBA) and PEO as hydrophilic block. 10 mol% of pyridyldisulfide ethyl acrylate (PDSA) were further included in the hydrophobic block to enable a sufficient crosslinking of the micelles after their assembly, which was found to minimize potential pro-inflammatory effects of such nanostructures 27,37,38 . The copolymer of PBA and PDSA was synthesized by reversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization to guarantee a narrow molar mass distribution of the polymer chains (see SI for experimental details and characterization; Supplementary Table 1, Fig.…”
Section: Polymer Synthesis and Formation Of Different Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required nanoparticles of different shape were prepared by self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers into micelles and subsequent crosslinking. Such polymeric micelles have already demonstrated their potential in nanomedicine [26][27][28][29] . Advantages of these self-assembled materials lie in the access to very small structures (< 50 nm) while maintaining narrow size distributions and the uniform and dense packing of hydrophilic chains on the surface (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19 ] The polymers themselves, nanoparticles, and their oxidized products have to be biocompatible [ 20 ] and demonstrate noninflammatory properties. [ 21 ] Recently we have reported a straightforward process to create novel ROS‐sensitive polymeric micelles comprising thioether moieties, which can be oxidized in the presence of H 2 O 2 resulting in a disintegration of the micelle. [ 22 ] These polymeric nanoparticles are directly prepared in aqueous solution by polymerization induced self‐assembly (PISA), which represents a straightforward way to prepare polymer micelles circumventing tedious assembly steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%