“…Efforts to characterize the nanoscale structure, energetics, and transport properties of clay–water assemblages are notoriously arduous, in part because these assemblages are stabilized by relatively weak interparticle interactions across nanometer-scale water films. ,, These interactions are highly sensitive to changes in the hydration state, external confining pressure, and aqueous chemistry conditions including salinity and connate counterion identity . Experimental techniques that provide a nanoscale view of minimally disrupted smectite–water assemblages [predominantly X-ray diffraction (XRD), ,, small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), − and cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) ,, ] indicate that they generally consist of relatively complex microstructures involving the coexistence of several stable hydration states, including crystalline hydrates with interclay separations of 0.3, 0.6, or 0.9 nm and osmotic hydrates with interclay separations of ≥3 nm. The crystalline hydrates are thought to be controlled by short-range ion and surface hydration forces in discrete water layers sandwiched between adjacent clay basal surfaces, whereas the osmotic hydrates are thought to reflect a balance of long-range van der Waals and electrostatic interactions between clay nanoparticles. − To date, no model has successfully incorporated both osmotic and crystalline hydrates simultaneously to correctly describe the structure, hydraulic permeability, or other properties of hydrated clay assemblages.…”