2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of crystal topology and interior surface functionality of metal-organic frameworks on PFOA sorption performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nitrobenzene adsorption capacity of MIL‐53(Al) decreases considerably with a decrease in the pH value of the water . ZIF‐L has high adsorption capacity for perfluorooctanoic acid; however, its crystal structure is essentially destroyed by the sorption operation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nitrobenzene adsorption capacity of MIL‐53(Al) decreases considerably with a decrease in the pH value of the water . ZIF‐L has high adsorption capacity for perfluorooctanoic acid; however, its crystal structure is essentially destroyed by the sorption operation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layered structure of ZIF‐L gives it high adsorption capacity as well as high adsorption selectivity for CO 2 . ZIF‐L also has excellent sorption capacity for perfluorooctanoic acid; however, its poor stability in aqueous phase greatly limits its applicability in water treatment processes …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the synergetic effects of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions were important factors in the adsorption process. Three MOFs, zeolitic imidazolate framework-7 (ZIF-7), ZIF-8, and ZIF-L were investigated for the adsorption of PFOA in an aqueous solution by Chen et al (2016). The PFOA sorption performance of ZIF-7, ZIF-8, and ZIF-L was then compared with the performance of two commercialized adsorbents, zeolite 13X and activated carbon.…”
Section: Mofs and Composites For Adsorptive Removal And Photocatalytimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Studied adsorbents range from activated carbon (AC), 20,21 minerals, 22,23 magnetic nanoparticles, 24 polymers, 25 resins, 26 functionalized cellulose 27 and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). [28][29][30][31][32] However, except for MOFs, most adsorbents only exhibit between low and moderate PFOA uptake compared to the industrial standard of AC (>90% removal, 3M Company, USA). 33 MOFs refer to a novel class of porous materials made from organic bridging linkers and metal atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%