2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of crystallite size on the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is extensive ongoing research into nanoscale magnetically ordered materials sparked by their potential applications in medicine (Pankhurst et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2007), magnetic sensors (Chen et al, 2011;Kennedy et al, 2014), RF components (Chinnasamy et al, 2015), magnetic fluids (Chen et al, 2011), and magnetic memory (Moser et al, 2002). Current research is driven by the fact that the properties of nanoscale ferromagnetic materials can be different from those seen in the bulk (Hendriksen et al, 1993;Batlle and Labarta, 2002;Goya et al, 2003;Upadhyay et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2019). For example, they have been reported to show enhanced coercivities that can be useful for magnetic memory storage devices (Barakat et al, 2009;Dong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive ongoing research into nanoscale magnetically ordered materials sparked by their potential applications in medicine (Pankhurst et al, 2003;Kim et al, 2007), magnetic sensors (Chen et al, 2011;Kennedy et al, 2014), RF components (Chinnasamy et al, 2015), magnetic fluids (Chen et al, 2011), and magnetic memory (Moser et al, 2002). Current research is driven by the fact that the properties of nanoscale ferromagnetic materials can be different from those seen in the bulk (Hendriksen et al, 1993;Batlle and Labarta, 2002;Goya et al, 2003;Upadhyay et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2019). For example, they have been reported to show enhanced coercivities that can be useful for magnetic memory storage devices (Barakat et al, 2009;Dong et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependent upon atom density, each crystallographic facet contains energetically distinct sites. High atom density at (311) may be associated with high reactivity of these crystalline facets [52]. By the equation, the estimated crystallite size of synthesized Fe 3 O 4 NPs was 83.4 nm, which figured out to be high purity crystalline [53].…”
Section: Xrd Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The broadening of XRD peaks was mainly caused by particle/crystallite size and lattice strains other than instrumental broadening. 7 The XRD-derived size is usually bigger than the so-called magnetic size, due to the fact that smaller domains are present in a particle where all moments are aligned in the same direction, even if the particle is single domain. On the contrary, the TEM-deduced size was higher than that calculated using XRD, for samples with very large particles; in fact, when the particle size is bigger than 50 nm, there are more than one crystal boundary on their surface.…”
Section: X-ray-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%