2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2016.7844677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cultural factors in dynamic trust in automation

Abstract: Abstract-The use of autonomous systems has been rapidly increasing in recent decades. To improve human-automation interaction, trust has been closely studied. Research shows trust is critical in the development of appropriate reliance on automation. To examine how trust mediates the human-automation relationships across cultures, the present study investigated the influences of cultural factors on trust in automation. Theoretically guided empirical studies were conducted in the U.S., Taiwan and Turkey to exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, only a handful of studies consider cultural factors and potential differences in the context of trust in automation, with [99,125] and [22] being exceptions. As the use of automation gets increasingly globalized, it is imperative that we gain an understanding on how trust in automation is conceptualized across cultures and how it influences operator reliance and use of automation, and overall human-system performance.…”
Section: Properties Of the Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only a handful of studies consider cultural factors and potential differences in the context of trust in automation, with [99,125] and [22] being exceptions. As the use of automation gets increasingly globalized, it is imperative that we gain an understanding on how trust in automation is conceptualized across cultures and how it influences operator reliance and use of automation, and overall human-system performance.…”
Section: Properties Of the Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure trust across cultures more accurately, we [22][23][24][25] have developed a new measure of trust in automation validated across large samples in three diverse cultures, U.S., Taiwan. and Turkey, as representative of Dignity, Face, and Honor cultures [26].…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data and analyses involved in the development of the instrument are archived in Reference [24] at OpenICPSR to provide open data for conducting additional validation testing, assembling specialized scales based on item data or testing hypotheses related to the scales. English, Chinese, and Turkish versions of the scales are available in Reference [24]. An English version of scale is provided in Appendix A.…”
Section: :3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In HRI fields, researchers employ two primary methods to investigate the supervisory processes. The first approach examines the overall system performance, such as the number of targets detected (Chen, 2009;Chien et al, 2012b), area explored (Scerri et al, 2011), or vehicles' damage levels (Chien et al, 2016;Imbert et al, 2014;Miller and Parasuraman, 2007). The other approach characterizes operators' attention allocation, such as the response rate in answering the robots' requests (Crandall and Cummings, 2007;Mekdeci and Cummings, 2009;Mercado et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%