2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cysteine doping on photoluminescence intensity from semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). We have assumed earlier that such enhancement can be related to the ability of cysteine to reduce p-defects due to the presence of a thiol group in the structure of this amino acid [12]. These defects can be formed when oxygen binds covalently to carbon atoms in nanotubes [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). We have assumed earlier that such enhancement can be related to the ability of cysteine to reduce p-defects due to the presence of a thiol group in the structure of this amino acid [12]. These defects can be formed when oxygen binds covalently to carbon atoms in nanotubes [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown [12] that the addition of cysteine to nanotubes also leads to an enhancement of the nanotube luminescence. This increase of the emission was explained by a reduction of defects, because this amino acid also contains the thiol group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…More importantly, no measurable reaction was detected when colloids were protected from ambient light with tin foil (Figure S8). We next investigated the change in solution pH after the addition of cysteine, a reductant, 63 or hydrogen peroxide, an oxidant (Figure 5b). Alkalization was observed upon addition of cysteine for lower illumination fluence (pH ∼ 9−10) and a shift of the acidic maximum occured from pH ∼ 3 (without cysteine) to pH ∼ 2 (with cysteine).…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical techniques, such as near-infrared fluorescence and photoluminescence excitation, albeit very powerful, are exclusively limited to individual SWCNTs, which is often unviable in many samples and procedures. 23,24 Raman spectroscopy is much more accessible and powerful as it is a non-destructive, contactless and quick technique that requires relatively simple or no preparation, and is greatly sensitive to changes in the physical and chemical properties of SWCNTs. 25 To characterize doping, Raman spectroscopy primarily relies on G-band shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%