“…This difference, which was not found in other reports that compared nonpenetrating surgery with penetrating surgery [1,[16][17][18] could be explained by differences in the trabeculectomy technique because, unlike the other studies, in the current study we did not enlarge the communication beyond the TDM, and excised a deep scleral block smaller than that in classic trabeculectomy. It had been reported that an increase in the weight and size of the deep scleral flap might result in a greater IOP reduction [19]. The fact that conjunctival and scleral flaps are smaller in standard trabeculectomy than in non-penetrating surgery converted to trabeculectomy could contribute in increasing the risk of scarring and failure of the latter, as there is a greater wound surface.…”