1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(97)01016-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of defects on surface scattering of UV photoemitted electrons in near perfect Si(111)1×1-H

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-For the upper valence band, the narrowest edgewidth was 110 meV at room temperature [7] as measured by photoemission yield spectroscopy in the 4-6.7 eV photon energy range with an instrument resolution (12 me V) significantly less than k T It is consistent with the high-kinetic-energy tailing of the Si 2p core level.…”
Section: -Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-For the upper valence band, the narrowest edgewidth was 110 meV at room temperature [7] as measured by photoemission yield spectroscopy in the 4-6.7 eV photon energy range with an instrument resolution (12 me V) significantly less than k T It is consistent with the high-kinetic-energy tailing of the Si 2p core level.…”
Section: -Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Only the dipole effect may be incriminated: it fits with the absence of band bending and the observed asymmetry. Moreover, a (strong) contamination by 4 percents of a monolayer of oxygen along the hydrogenated surface has been found to increase the edgewidth to 300 meV, the ionisation energy of the system being decreased by the same amount [7]. Possibly, an undetected oxygen contamination may always be high enough to maintain, as a OH dipole effect, the relatively wide and asymmetrical linewidth observed.…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…must match the experimental surface when predicting surface dipoles using DFT. These findings also suggest that the effective band-edge energies of a surface can be engineered to have a specific [33] Photoelectron Spectroscopy [48,49], [86,87] wxaMPS [83] dfT & MBPT [71] −0.40 v (n-Si) −0.49 ev −0.35 ev…”
Section: Band-edge Control Of Siliconmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The dipole shift determined using impedance spectroscopy in contact with octamethylferrocene-CH 3 CN-1.0 M LiClO4 is measured as −0.4 V and −0.25 V for n and p-Si(111), respectively [33]. The dipole shift determined using photoelectron spectroscopy in contact with vacuum is measured as −0.49 eV [48,49], [86,87]. These results are summarized in Table 1 below.…”
Section: Band-edge Control Of Siliconmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This value may be compared to other Si surface terminations as ͓Si͑111͒ :H͔ = 4.17 eV, 44,45 ͓Si͑111͒ − ͑7 ϫ 7͔͒ = 4.16 eV, 36 and ͓Si͑100͒ − ͑2 ϫ 1͔͒ = 4.21 eV. 36 Estimating the electron affinity of bulk silicon as 4.05 eV, 46 the surface dipole ␦ caused by the methyl monolayer was calculated to be ϳ−0.4 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%