2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2158522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Demagnetization Effect on the Kinetics of the Itinerant Electron Metamagnetic Transition in Magnetic Refrigerant ${\rm La}{({\rm Fe}_{0.88}{\rm Si}_{0.12})}_{13}$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of the zero-field, thermally induced transition in macroscopic bulk samples has been well described by the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami model of nucleation and growth [12], showing a cooling rate dependence, although more recent work in small fragments studied in vacuum found an athermal rate-independent character to features associated with avalanche-like behaviour in the zero (or very low)-field transition [13]. The temporal evolution of the isothermal transition has also been studied previously [11] and found to evolve from PM to FM over surprisingly long time scales of the order of tens to hundreds of seconds, affected by the demagnetization (shape) of the sample and the magnetic dipole coupling. Previously, we have shown that thermal linkage across the sample plays an equally important role in the temporal evolution of the transition [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolution of the zero-field, thermally induced transition in macroscopic bulk samples has been well described by the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami model of nucleation and growth [12], showing a cooling rate dependence, although more recent work in small fragments studied in vacuum found an athermal rate-independent character to features associated with avalanche-like behaviour in the zero (or very low)-field transition [13]. The temporal evolution of the isothermal transition has also been studied previously [11] and found to evolve from PM to FM over surprisingly long time scales of the order of tens to hundreds of seconds, affected by the demagnetization (shape) of the sample and the magnetic dipole coupling. Previously, we have shown that thermal linkage across the sample plays an equally important role in the temporal evolution of the transition [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Field was applied parallel to the axis of the longest sample dimension (i.e. the smallest demagnetizing factor), which yields the maximum magnetic relaxation rate as has been previously shown [11]. For the magnetic relaxation measurements, the field sweep rate to reach the target field was set at 1.7 or 8.3 mT s −1 , as described in the text.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All prototypes to date use magnetic materials that undergo continuous phase transitions in fi eld (such as Gd), [ 2 ] however, in order to reduce the magnetic fi elds required for the applications, there is a move to consider fi rst-order magnetocaloric materials that offer higher performance per Tesla. Here, we study the magnetization ( M ) dynamics of the transition in a fi rst-order metamagnetic material in response temperature in LaFe 13-x Si x -based materials; [13][14][15][16] generally the M-H loops show "fl aring" as the fi eld rate is increased resulting in increased magnetic hysteresis ( Figure 1 a). Here, we study the magnetization ( M ) dynamics of the transition in a fi rst-order metamagnetic material in response temperature in LaFe 13-x Si x -based materials; [13][14][15][16] generally the M-H loops show "fl aring" as the fi eld rate is increased resulting in increased magnetic hysteresis ( Figure 1 a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we study the magnetization ( M ) dynamics of the transition in a fi rst-order metamagnetic material in response temperature in LaFe 13-x Si x -based materials; [13][14][15][16] generally the M-H loops show "fl aring" as the fi eld rate is increased resulting in increased magnetic hysteresis ( Figure 1 a). Alternatively in the latter case, it has also been suggested that this effect is an intrinsic nucleation and growth process dominated locally by heating/cooling at the phase boundary and the dipole interaction, [ 15,17 ] or by thermal activation over the energy barrier. In the former case once the PM-FM transition has started at some part of the sample, the increase in temperature from the nucleated region heats the surrounding regions and therefore increases their critical fi elds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specimen: magnetic-fields direction is parallel (a) and perpendicular (b) to the longitudinal axis of the specimen 22) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%