2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of depression and effect of treatment with sertraline on quality of life after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16,27 Given our findings, there is a need to further explore the association of depressive symptoms with prognosis, patients' health status, and to identify potential underlying mechanisms and uses of this information in designing strategies to maximize PAD patients' health status outcomes. 28 Several limitations should be considered when interpreting our findings. First, this is a prospective, single-center registry of patients undergoing PTA only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,27 Given our findings, there is a need to further explore the association of depressive symptoms with prognosis, patients' health status, and to identify potential underlying mechanisms and uses of this information in designing strategies to maximize PAD patients' health status outcomes. 28 Several limitations should be considered when interpreting our findings. First, this is a prospective, single-center registry of patients undergoing PTA only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSRIs generally do not slow cardiac conduction, cause orthostatic hypotension, decrease heart rate variability, or alter QT variability measures (9,14). In regard to treatment, SSRIs appear to be safe for use in cardiac patients and can improve both depressive symptoms and quality of life (17,36,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Ketterer and colleagues, if a given risk factor cannot be modified, irrespective of whether it is causal, it has no clinical utility [55]. Although recent intervention trials targeting other psychosocial risk factors have shown mixed results, such as the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) study [56], the Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART) [57,58], and the randomized Exhaustion Intervention Trial (EXIT) [59], there is suggestive evidence from these and other trials that a reduction in negative emotions may lead to improved prognosis [60,61]. Although social inhibition may be less amenable to change, it is important to note that a reduction in negative affectivity (below the standardized cut-off of 10) would make the difference between whether a patient is classified as Type D or not.…”
Section: Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%