2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-009-9276-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of di-hydrogen phosphate ion on performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane for nitrate and nitrite removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 To diminish this potential health risk, the concentration limit for NO 3 À in drinking water is set at 10 and 11.3 ppm by the United States EPA and the European Drinking Water Directive, respectively. 2,3 Therefore, various technologies have been developed to remove nitrate from water, such as microbial technology, 4 adsorption technology, 5 reverse osmosis technology, 6 electro-dialysis technology, 7 photocatalytic reduction technology, 8 chemical catalytic reduction technology, [9][10][11] and electrocatalytic reduction technology. [11][12][13][14] Electrochemical denitrification can achieve the selective conversion of NO ) or nitrogen gas (N 2 ) and has been regarded as a promising method for NO 3 À removal due to its high efficiency, moderate operating conditions, relatively low investment costs, no sludge production, and high practicability for treating real nitrite wastewater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 To diminish this potential health risk, the concentration limit for NO 3 À in drinking water is set at 10 and 11.3 ppm by the United States EPA and the European Drinking Water Directive, respectively. 2,3 Therefore, various technologies have been developed to remove nitrate from water, such as microbial technology, 4 adsorption technology, 5 reverse osmosis technology, 6 electro-dialysis technology, 7 photocatalytic reduction technology, 8 chemical catalytic reduction technology, [9][10][11] and electrocatalytic reduction technology. [11][12][13][14] Electrochemical denitrification can achieve the selective conversion of NO ) or nitrogen gas (N 2 ) and has been regarded as a promising method for NO 3 À removal due to its high efficiency, moderate operating conditions, relatively low investment costs, no sludge production, and high practicability for treating real nitrite wastewater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Denitrification, which is the reduction of nitrate to its end product (i.e., nitrogen gas), has been used extensively around the world to remove nitrate from wastewater and groundwater. [7,8] Other physical and chemical processes involve electrochemical processes, [9] activated carbon adsorption, [10] reverse osmosis, [11] ion exchange, [12] biotic, [13] and abiotic nitrate reduction by iron. [14] Recently, many researchers have focused on combining two or more of the aforementioned in situ nitrate removal methods, because their efficiency is high, which suggests a lack of sludge production during contaminant removal, smaller footprint, comparatively low investment costs, tolerance to the elevated levels of pollutants, and high efficacy in contaminant removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing methods for nitrates and nitrites can be physical, chemical or biological. Physical techniques include reverse osmosis [4], ion exchange [5], catalyst reduction [6], electro-dialysis [7] and carbon activation [8]. Chemical methods include chemical denitrification [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%