1997
DOI: 10.1109/66.572070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of die attachment on MOS transistor matching

Abstract: A test chip which allows the experimental study of the influence of die residual stresses on MOS transistor matching, in a standard 0.7 m CMOS technology, is described. The influence of eutectic die bonding on transistor matching is found to be a major degradation factor. Polyimide bonded dies do not significantly affect the matching performance of MOS transistors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large area devices have been designed to minimize device parameter variations. Critically matched transistors of the input differential stage are placed on the die's central axis where low stress gradients occur in order to minimize sensitivity to die stress [4].…”
Section: Proposed Amplifier Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large area devices have been designed to minimize device parameter variations. Critically matched transistors of the input differential stage are placed on the die's central axis where low stress gradients occur in order to minimize sensitivity to die stress [4].…”
Section: Proposed Amplifier Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large chip area can result in systematic errors. Examples of systematic errors are gradient errors [1], [2] and temperature gradients [3]. In [4], a switching sequence was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input-referred, OTA3 mismatch voltage given by (9) would increase to near the 1.1 mV measured value if this additional mismatch was included for each of the four device pairs. In [126,131,138,139,154], threshold voltage and transconductance factor distance mismatch is reported from experimental measurements. There is considerable variability in distance mismatch since it is a strong function of die attachment and stress [139,152].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%