1995
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00180-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different aerobic pretreatments on the kinetics of anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
58
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 3, when the biomass in the bioreactor concentration (X) increased from 0.23 g/l to 0.93 the δ increased from 0.085 to 0.109 was, therefore, multiplied by a factor of 1.3. A similar behaviour was observed in the anaerobic digestion process of traditional olive mill wastewaters (Borja et al, 1995). In this work, the minimum hydraulic retention time, θ min (days), at which the washout of the micro-organisms occurs was: 9.04 days.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As can be seen in Table 3, when the biomass in the bioreactor concentration (X) increased from 0.23 g/l to 0.93 the δ increased from 0.085 to 0.109 was, therefore, multiplied by a factor of 1.3. A similar behaviour was observed in the anaerobic digestion process of traditional olive mill wastewaters (Borja et al, 1995). In this work, the minimum hydraulic retention time, θ min (days), at which the washout of the micro-organisms occurs was: 9.04 days.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Martín et al, (1991) obtained methane yields of 260 mL CH 4 g -1 COD for 3POMWW. Borja et al (1995b) improved the methane production using a pre-treatment stage with Geotrichum candidum, Azotobacter Chroococcum and Aspergillus terreus. The latest study reported methane yield coefficients of 300 (Geotrichum-pretreated 3POMWW), 315 (Azotobacter-pretreated 3POMWW) and 350 (Aspergillus-pretreated 3POMWW) mL CH 4 g -1 COD against the 260 mL CH 4 g -1 COD obtained for the untreated 3POMWW.…”
Section: Three-phase Olive Mill Wastewaters (3pomww)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed to solve this problem. To name a few, physico-chemical methods involving the use of processes, such as flocculation, coagulation, filtration, open evaporating ponds and incineration [2,3], biological processes depending on the aerobic or aneorobic treatment of the wastewater [4,5], a method involving the co-composting of the wastewater with solid residues from the olive oil processing [6] and the electrochemical treatment of the wastewater [7] have been tested. Some of these methods are ineffective or expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%