2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03744-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different endodontic sealers on bond strength of fiber posts to weakened roots after resin restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors explained this result as the dependence of bond strength on the surface area of intertubular dentin than to tubule density. (45,46) On the other hand, our results contradict previous studies (47,48) that detected increased bond strength significantly in coronal and middle regions than apical one. Authors attributed this to morphological differences, such as the reduction in the number, density, and diameter of dentinal tubules.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Authors explained this result as the dependence of bond strength on the surface area of intertubular dentin than to tubule density. (45,46) On the other hand, our results contradict previous studies (47,48) that detected increased bond strength significantly in coronal and middle regions than apical one. Authors attributed this to morphological differences, such as the reduction in the number, density, and diameter of dentinal tubules.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…FP systems are extensively preferred to restore ETT because these FPs have an elastic modulus similar to the root dentin and produce monoblock restoration, resulting reinforcement in structurally compromised roots such as flared ones. [8][9][10][11] The self-adhesive resin cement does not require any pretreatment of the tooth surface. Once the cement is mixed, its application steps are quite simple.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Laboratory and finite element analysis (FEA) studies also revealed that FP can protect remaining tooth structures against extensive fracture loads that can cause catastrophic (nonrestorable) failures. [11][12][13] They facilitate creating a monoblock restoration that acts as a single unit against masticatory forces. 14 It is of great importance to improve the prognosis of ETT with weakened roots facing higher fracture risk by obtaining a better monoblock structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently argument used to justify this adverse effect is the own composition of this sealer. [3][4][5][6] Eugenol interferes with the polymerization of the composite resin, changing its physical and mechanical properties. [3][4][5][6] Conversely, AH Plus, a free-eugenol resinepoxy-based root canal sealer, probably promoted a low, if any, interference with the polymerization process of the reinforce material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Root canal sealers containing eugenol significantly compromise the bond strength of resinous materials when they are used for the placement of intracanal posts. [3][4][5][6] On the other hand, this side-effect does not occurs when the placement of fiberglass posts is performed with self-etching resinous cements after using resin-based endodontic sealers. 5 Smear layer removal prior the placement of intracanal posts enhances the penetration of resin cements into the dentinal tubules, thus favoring the interlock between the cement and dentin substrate, increasing the bond strength of restorative materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%