1991
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90025-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
133
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
19
133
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed hand behaviour was consistent with what has been seen in previous grasping studies (Gentilucci et al, 1991;Jakobson & Goodale, 1991;Jeannerod, 1986;Paulignan, Jeannerod, MacKenzie, & Marteniuk, 1991). Participants demonstrated accurate grip scaling, opening their hand the widest for the largest block (Fig.…”
Section: Grasp Kinematicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The observed hand behaviour was consistent with what has been seen in previous grasping studies (Gentilucci et al, 1991;Jakobson & Goodale, 1991;Jeannerod, 1986;Paulignan, Jeannerod, MacKenzie, & Marteniuk, 1991). Participants demonstrated accurate grip scaling, opening their hand the widest for the largest block (Fig.…”
Section: Grasp Kinematicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Object location perturbations are also perturbations in distance between wrist marker and target (e.g., ¡20°/32 cm to 0°/30 cm; 0°/30 cm to 20°/32 cm). It is well known that movement amplitude has an eVect on movement time, latency, transport velocity and grasp aperture (Gentilucci et al, 1991). The perturbation of both object position and distance results in the attenuation of the direction eVect for most measures seen in direct prehension, except for transport velocity amplitude and grasp aperture, suggesting a putative coordination between the two visuomotor channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One result on which most agree is that transport velocity (of the wrist) and movement amplitude are a direct consequence of the distance between the hand and the object (Gentilucci et al, 1991). However, varying the location of the object yields conXicting results with respect to the grasping module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of coupling between the reach and grasp motions is inspired by extensive evidence in neuro-physiological studies [10,13,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. The most frequently reported mechanism suggests a parallel, but time-coupled evolution of the reach and grasp motions with synchronized termination.…”
Section: Biological Evidencesmentioning
confidence: 99%