2006
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01632-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Disk Separation Distance on Accuracy of the Disk Approximation Test for Detection of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance inStaphylococcusspp

Abstract: We undertook this study to assess the accuracy of the clindamycin-erythromycin disk approximation test (D-test) for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus spp. One hundred sixty-three Staphylococcus aureus and 68 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) spp. which were erythromycin nonsusceptible but clindamycin susceptible were tested using the D-test performed at both 15-mm and 22-mm disk separations and compared with genotyping as the "gold standard." The rate of inducible clindamyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
32
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, the MRSA prevalence is still low, but is increasing. 10 The higher percentage of S. aureus with a MRSA-related genetic background might result in a higher MRSA carriage rate among GPs, and in transmission of MRSA from GPs to patients.…”
Section: Implications For Future Research and Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, the MRSA prevalence is still low, but is increasing. 10 The higher percentage of S. aureus with a MRSA-related genetic background might result in a higher MRSA carriage rate among GPs, and in transmission of MRSA from GPs to patients.…”
Section: Implications For Future Research and Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in resistance to macrolides and streptogramin B antibiotics, but not to lincosamides (MS phenotype). Clindamycin is active against such isolates and there is no risk of therapy failure in such cases [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrolide resistance due to ribosomal target modification affects the activities of both macrolides and clindamycin; it is mediated by erythromycin ribosomal methylases encoded by ermA/ermC genes. Such resistance may be inducible or constitutive [8,9]. Macrolide resistance due to active efflux is encoded by the macrolide-streptogramin resistance (msrA) gene in Staphylococcus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can only speculate that the difference between our results and those of Fiebelkorn and colleagues is caused by the difference in the genes that encode the inducible resistance. It has been shown that isolates with erm(A) show more false-negative D-test results than isolates with erm(C) (O'Sullivan et al, 2006). The difference in the genes encoding inducible resistance to clindamycin might also explain why there are more false-negative D-tests for S. aureus isolates in tests where disks are placed at a distance of 25 mm, while for CNS isolates the number of falsenegative isolates at this distance is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%