2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.12.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of downstream pressure on pervaporation properties of PDMS and POMS based membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of hydrophobic polymers have been investigated for organophilic pervaporation, including poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [9], poly(octylmethyl siloxane) (POMS) [10][11][12], polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [13], polyether-block-polyamide (PEBA) [14], poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP) [15] and the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 [16][17][18][19]. Inorganic membrane materials such as silicalite-1 [20] have also been employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of hydrophobic polymers have been investigated for organophilic pervaporation, including poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [9], poly(octylmethyl siloxane) (POMS) [10][11][12], polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [13], polyether-block-polyamide (PEBA) [14], poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP) [15] and the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 [16][17][18][19]. Inorganic membrane materials such as silicalite-1 [20] have also been employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeate pressure has a significant influence on the fluxes but not on the separation factor, as the fluxes decrease with increasing permeate pressure and the separation factor remains almost constant. The driving force for mass transfer across the membrane in the PV process is the difference in the partial vapor‐liquid pressure of the separated species across the membrane, which can be created by vacuum . An increase in permeate pressure will decrease the difference in partial pressure and the transmembrane driving force, leading to a lower flux .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFF droplet lies quiescently and spreads out on the top surface of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) in the absence of applied fields, as shown in Figure 1 a. Its contact angle is about 39°, which indicates the PFF wettability on the surface of PDMS, though PDMS has a relatively low surface tension [ 33 ]. The spreading droplet is drawn into an identical pointed cone geometry when the magnetic field is applied on the PFF droplet, as shown in Figure 1 b, which is the Rosensweig instability of the PFF droplet by the static self-assembling under the magnetic field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%