This study examined the relationship between measured and derived anthropometric measurements with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measured lean and fat mass at 3.0 Ϯ 2.8 (SD) days in 120 neonates with birth weights appropriate (AGA; n ϭ 74), large (LGA; n ϭ 30); or small (SGA, n ϭ 16) for gestational age. Anthropometric measurements, including total body weight and length, and regional measurements, including circumferences of head, chest, abdomen, midarm, and midthigh and dynamic skinfold thickness (15 and 60 s) at tricep, subscapular, suprailiac, and midthigh, were performed. Derived anthropometry included muscle and fat areas, and ratios were calculated from direct measurements. The skinfold thickness measurements between 15 and 60 s were highly correlated (r ϭ 0.973-0.996, p Ͻ 0.001 for all comparisons). Strong correlations existed within the four circumferences of trunk and extremities, the four skinfolds, and the ratios of weight to length and its higher powers. Weight and length accounted for Ͼ97% of the variance of lean mass in AGA and SGA infants and 46% of the variance in LGA infants and for 80, 82, and 84% of the variance of fat mass in SGA, AGA, and LGA infants, respectively, whereas midarm:head circumference ratio and arm muscle and fat areas are the most important derived anthropometry in the prediction for body composition. They independently accounted for up to 16.5 and 10.2%, respectively, of the variance in body composition depending on the state of in utero growth. Thus, total body weight and length and some selected regional and derived anthropometry accounted for the vast majority of the variance of body composition. (Pediatr Res 56: 694-700, 2004) Abbreviations AGA, appropriate for gestational age DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry LGA, large for gestational age SGA, small for gestational age Weight, length, and head circumference are classic anthropometric measurements to assess growth and nutritional status in the newborn infant. Birth weight is well recognized to have prognostic value for postnatal mortality (1,2), and its use in conjunction with gestation is useful for predicting morbidity (3-6). The simplicity of these measurements and the ease in training an operator to generate highly reproducible results have ensured their use in clinical situations. However, the clinical role of regional anthropometric measurement including circumference and skinfold thickness from various sites on the body and extremities is not well defined. Some reports indicated that regional anthropometry or the ratios and formulas derived from these measurements are good predictors of fetal growth and metabolic disturbances noted in neonates who are over-or undergrown for the duration of gestation (7-9). These refinements of regional anthropometry are thought to reflect more specific body composition, namely lean mass and fat mass (10,11), which allows assessment of the quality of growth such as the extent of energy, fat and protein deposition, and the potential mechanism for disturbed metabolism in infa...