2016
DOI: 10.3934/environsci.2016.1.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of everyday activities and presence of people in common indoor environments on exposure to airborne fungi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For food-related activities, such as breakfast preparation, other cooking, and applesauce making, potential sources of biological particles include direct shedding from the occupants, resuspension from clothing and flooring, biological particles aerosolized from tap water and boiling water (via bubble-bursting), and emissions from processing food. 15,21,22,42,43 Breakfast preparation followed a relatively consistent pattern each day, as described in the SI, and resulted in similar FBAP emissions for the 2 campaigns. Although emissions during summer were slightly higher, the seasonal differences were not statistically significant for FBAP particles.…”
Section: Fbap Emissions For Human Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For food-related activities, such as breakfast preparation, other cooking, and applesauce making, potential sources of biological particles include direct shedding from the occupants, resuspension from clothing and flooring, biological particles aerosolized from tap water and boiling water (via bubble-bursting), and emissions from processing food. 15,21,22,42,43 Breakfast preparation followed a relatively consistent pattern each day, as described in the SI, and resulted in similar FBAP emissions for the 2 campaigns. Although emissions during summer were slightly higher, the seasonal differences were not statistically significant for FBAP particles.…”
Section: Fbap Emissions For Human Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[14][15][16][17] Human occupants can influence airborne biological particle levels in residences via respiratory emissions (ie, sneezing), shedding of bacteria-laden skin flakes, movement-induced resuspension from clothing, upholstery materials, mattress, and flooring, and other ordinary household activities, such as showering, handling fabrics, sweeping floors, and vacuuming. 14,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23] Activities such as these result in strong enhancements of bioaerosol concentrations, often over short periods. Considering the potential for rapidly changing indoor bioaerosol concentrations, sampling methods with high time resolution can make important contributions to the state of knowledge regarding bioaerosol exposures in residential environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy regarding the correlation between particulate matter and bioburden in different occupational environments, with active and passive methods employed for the assessment of air bioaerosols, can be justified by the effect of other environmental variables, such as workers and customers who may carry a great diversity of microorganisms [60], as well as the developed activities and work practices that may also affect fungal and bacterial load [13,51,52,55,61]. Moreover, we cannot neglect the fact that viable bioaerosol particles constitute a small percentage of the total concentration of the bioburden [62] and, therefore, a bias about the microorganism load recovered from the EDC, as in other sampling methods, should be considered as a justification for the lack of correlation or negative correlation among EDC weight and fungal counts on MEA and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. The same explanation can also be given for the significant negative correlation between particle counts (0.3 µm) and the fungal counts on MEA and between all particle sizes, except particles PM 5 µm, and Gram-negative bacteria assessed through the EDC, although in this case the correlation was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the assessment and control of microbial contamination in health care facilities is currently a mandatory and vital part of the strategies to prevent and control hospital-acquired infections [7,8]. Aiming at addressing this challenging assessment, several studies have already reported the upmost importance of applying passive sampling methods [9][10][11][12][13]. These methods allow characterization of the contamination from a larger period of time (weeks to several months) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%