2016
DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of factors on mammographic density in premenopausal Chinese women

Abstract: Mammographic density is an independent strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, the influence of factors on mammographic density in premenopausal women remains unclear. In the Southern Professional Women Breast Cancer Screening Project, we assessed the associations between mammographic density and its influential factors using multivariate logistic regression in premenopausal women adjusting for BMI, age, duration of breastfeeding, number of live births, and breast size. A total of 1699 premenopausal wom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also variability between studies in the questions used to assess alcohol intake, and in the units in which alcohol intake was measured. Several studies (19,24,26,(28)(29)(30)33) noted that alcohol consumption was low within the study population, which may have influenced the results, and there were six studies (20-23, 36, 40) with less than 300 participants. These uncontrolled sources of variation are reflected in the tests of heterogeneity that were statistically significant in all three groups of studies and remained significant in the sensitivity analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There was also variability between studies in the questions used to assess alcohol intake, and in the units in which alcohol intake was measured. Several studies (19,24,26,(28)(29)(30)33) noted that alcohol consumption was low within the study population, which may have influenced the results, and there were six studies (20-23, 36, 40) with less than 300 participants. These uncontrolled sources of variation are reflected in the tests of heterogeneity that were statistically significant in all three groups of studies and remained significant in the sensitivity analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies in groups 1 and 2 adjusted coefficients for body mass index (BMI) or weight, and only two studies, both in group 3, did not adjust for BMI or weight (33,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations