2008
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2008.263.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Fasting or Early Feeding on Broiler Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative weight of gizzard was higher in T3 group in comparison to the other groups at days 14 and 28 of age. These findings are in agreement with those reported by El-Husseiny et al (2008) who observed that feed deprivation during the first 48 h posthatch affected intestinal organ development. The current findings suggested that early access to feed rich in CP content or containing molasses stimulates the growth of the small intestine and gizzard.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The relative weight of gizzard was higher in T3 group in comparison to the other groups at days 14 and 28 of age. These findings are in agreement with those reported by El-Husseiny et al (2008) who observed that feed deprivation during the first 48 h posthatch affected intestinal organ development. The current findings suggested that early access to feed rich in CP content or containing molasses stimulates the growth of the small intestine and gizzard.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The relative weight of abdominal fat significantly increased by AFW during the transportation. This observation did not agree with the report from El-Husseiny et al (2008) who did not find any effect of moment of first nutrition (ranging between one to 7 days after hatch) on abdominal fat in broiler chickens. In this study, early access to feed and water resulted in higher live weight and higher FC at the slaughter age of 42 d. Therefore, higher breast fillet, and higher abdominal fat probably associated with increased feed intake in this group.…”
Section: Carcass and Carcass Parts Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This may occur because glucose is absorbed with no additional enzymatic activity, which yields no stimulation of intestinal processes. These results in consist with El-Husseiny et al (2008) who indicated that a decrease in body weight gains and higher feed to gain ratio, resulting from holding chicks without feed, continued to affect chicks up to 6 weeks post hatch. The overall FCR was not affected by delay in first feeding (Abed et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…While, Juul -Madsen et al (2004), Vargas et al (2009) and Rammouz et al (2011) found that post hatching delay in feed access did not affect chicken body weight at market age. El-Husseiny et al (2008) indicated that a decrease in body weight gains and higher feed to gain ratio, resulting from holding chicks without feed, continued to affect chicks up to 6 weeks post hatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%