2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Filler Addition on Mechanical Behavior of Cementitious Mortar-Rubber Aggregates: Experimental Study and Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A general increase in porosity is shown by the increase in rubber aggregates content in natural sand volume replacement compared to the reference mortar. Similar results are reported in other studies carried out on RW-based mortars [37] and rubberized concrete [46,55,56]. The order increases are 24.55, 28.22, and 30.42% for 5RW, 10RW, and 15RW, respectively, compared to the reference mortar.…”
Section: Porosity Accessible To Watersupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A general increase in porosity is shown by the increase in rubber aggregates content in natural sand volume replacement compared to the reference mortar. Similar results are reported in other studies carried out on RW-based mortars [37] and rubberized concrete [46,55,56]. The order increases are 24.55, 28.22, and 30.42% for 5RW, 10RW, and 15RW, respectively, compared to the reference mortar.…”
Section: Porosity Accessible To Watersupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies have mentioned that immersing the waste rubber into a solution of NaOH [28], covering it with a thin layer of cement [29], using styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) [30], using organic sulfur [31], and using a silane coupling agent with a coating [32] all contributed to improved strength. Improved properties were also shown in rubber concrete with addition of silica fume (SF) [33,34], fly ash [35,36], calcareous [37], steel fibers [38], and polyvinyl alcohol fibers (PVA) [39][40][41][42]. Copetti et al [34] replaced Portland cement (7.5% and 15% ratios) with silica fume in rubber concrete, up to 80% gains in compressive strength 28 days with 30% rubber replacement were resulted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several researchers suggested that the bonding among cement pastes and particles of the WRTCs can be improved either by treating the rubber aggregates with the NaOH solution or adding supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Turki et al [ 19 ] also demonstrated that the mechanical properties of the rubberized concretes could be improved through the combination of mineral fillers, such as siliceous or limestone, with the rubber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from the four developed prediction models were compared with the verification data to confirm the feasibility of this approach for one type of metal materials. Furthermore, a similar modelling research elaborated by Turki et al (2012) investigated the effect of filler on the mechanical behaviour modelling of mortar-rubber by using the ANFIS method. Other modelling studies (Turki, Zarrad, Mollines, Rouis and Queneudec, 2009) on the mechanical behaviour modelling of mortarrubber aggregates composite took into account the influence of the rubber volume fraction on mortar phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressive strength of cementitious materials ANFIS does not provide a specific equation in comparison with other types of models (Neil and Senouci, 1994;Shafieyzadeh, 2013;Turki et al, 2012). The model was developed by Turki, Zarrad, Mollines, Rouis and Queneudec (2009) and Turki, Ben Naceur, Makni, Rouis and Sai (2009) in the thermodynamic frame of non-associated plasticity with the Continuum Damage Mechanics theory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%