Influence of Filler Material on the Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel Weld Joints

Shanmugasundar, G.; Bansod, Ankur V.; Schindlerová, Vladimíra; Čep, Róbert

doi:10.3390/ma16041590

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By considering both strength and quality in tandem, this approach helps ensure the system's resilience and performance even in the face of unpredictable factors or variations. [5] By employing robust optimization and particularly robust design techniques, substantial decreases in development time and cost can be achieved, while simultaneously enhancing product quality and reliability. Despite these potential benefits, deterministic optimization methods are predominantly used, and the integration of unobtrusive and robust design practices in product reliability remains underexplored.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robust Design of Aero Engine Structures: Using the Weighted Product Method

2023

aae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Total loss of quality in products or processes Reduction is the objective of robust design. Strong Design is an effective approach that aims to simultaneously decrease product costs and enhance quality while also significantly reducing development time. Strength is defined as a skill Raw material, operating conditions, process equipment, environmental conditions, and human Expected variation in factors Tolerant manufacturing process. Robust design is the design of products, devices, and manufacturing equipment so that their performance and functionality are insensitive to multiple variations, such as manufacturing and assembly tolerances, ambient use conditions, or degradation over time. Therefore, there is not strong design sensitivity – meaning that variation in the product will have minimal influence. In essence, robust design means minimizing the impact of variation on a product. One or more due to unforeseen circumstances Input variables or assumptions are rigorous although modified, their output and predictions are accurate A model is considered robust if. The alternatives being considered are related to specific aircraft features: the aerodynamic characteristic (C1), maximum takeoff weight (C2), armament (C3), and avionics (C4). The evaluation options are Ao, F-16, Su-35, and Mig-35. Based on the evaluation results, Ao obtained the top rank, while Mig-35 received the lowest rank.The value of the dataset for Robust Design of Aero Engine in Weighted product method shows that it results in Ao and top ranking

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%