Relationships of Polymeric Structure and Properties
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0114372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of filler on the polypropylene structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of n vary within the range of 2.5–2.9 for pure PP and 1.8–2.3 for composites, depending on the crystallization temperature and the talc type. According to previous studies, the fractional values of n can be assigned to different spatial growth of crystals, depending on their value 21. For PP, n is equal to or greater than 2.5 indicating that the dominant crystal morphology is spherulitic, as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The values of n vary within the range of 2.5–2.9 for pure PP and 1.8–2.3 for composites, depending on the crystallization temperature and the talc type. According to previous studies, the fractional values of n can be assigned to different spatial growth of crystals, depending on their value 21. For PP, n is equal to or greater than 2.5 indicating that the dominant crystal morphology is spherulitic, as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Even the T c and T m of powdered PP filled with Al(OH) 3 are higher than those of pelletized PP filled with Al(OH) 3 . It is well known that many fillers are heterogeneous nucleating agents for PP, influencing not only its temperature and degree of crystallization, but also the nature of the micromorphology in the crystalline phase 36, 37. It is suggested that Al(OH) 3 /PP composites prepared by powdered PP more significantly improved the filler dispersion in the matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a crystalline phase in the PP matrix creates astructure similar to at wo-phase blend with one phase crystalline and the other amorphous (Nielsen and Landel, 1993). Some nanotubes may act as nucleating agents for the start of non-isothermal crystallization during cooling but most of them are expected to be found only in the amorphous phase since from the thermodynamic point of view fillers and other impurities cannot exist in acrystal as they interfere with the ordering process (Sharples, 1966;Khunová et al, 1988;Nordmark and Ziegler, 2002). In their demonstration of spherulitic crystallization from polypropylene melts, Keith and Padden (1964) show that molecules of low molecular weight considered as \ impurities" are rejected preferentially by the growing crystals in asegregation process and may play amajor role in determining the crystalline structure.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PP exhibits avery poor compatibility and low adhesion towards other materials and inorganic fillers owing to its non-polarity and absence of functional groups. It has been found that in PP/clay nanocomposites, crystallization of the PP matrix led to clay platelets expulsion from the crystalline phase by thermodynamic forces (Khunová et al, 1988). Breuer et al (1998) studied the effect of shear rate on electrical resistivity of HIPS/LLDPE/CB extrudates produced by ac apillary rheometer and found that it was more sensitive to shear rate for single matrix composites than for blend composites and that, in most cases, the resistivity increased with shear rate.We also previously showed that high degrees of nanotube alignment in the flow direction resulted in asignificantincrease in the electrical percolation threshold of polycarbonate (PC)-MWCNT nanocomposites (Abbasi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%