1989
DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90077-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of fillers on the water sorption of composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
63
0
12

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
63
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…RelyX Veneer, VariolinkII, and Nexus 2 all contained bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), which has two hydroxyl groups per molecule that can hydrogen-bond with absorbed water 36) . In addition, the nature and quality of links between the fillers and matrix resins are also important 4,37) with regard to water sorption. It is difficult to correlate data for sorption and solubility from other studies, as the results will inevitably differ due to the employment of different time periods and different units of measurement 38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RelyX Veneer, VariolinkII, and Nexus 2 all contained bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), which has two hydroxyl groups per molecule that can hydrogen-bond with absorbed water 36) . In addition, the nature and quality of links between the fillers and matrix resins are also important 4,37) with regard to water sorption. It is difficult to correlate data for sorption and solubility from other studies, as the results will inevitably differ due to the employment of different time periods and different units of measurement 38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be reiterated that clinically, solubility and sorption may cause stressinduced degradation of the luting cement 1) . The latter then leads to debonding and/or fracture of the restoration 4,5) , increased marginal leakage 6,7) , and increased potential for secondary caries 2) . Resin-based luting cements are becoming increasingly used in clinical practice for porcelain veneers, all-ceramic crowns, and more recently, inlay, onlay, and laminate restorations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resin matrix of the composites was believed to have absorbed water -usually in a small percentage, and which then changed the magnitude of some physical properties 41) . Differences in water sorption values also stemmed from differences in the following aspects: chemical composition of the matrix monomers, diffusion coefficient and boundary conditions at the surface of material, pore size and pore volume, and the rate of polymerization 13,[42][43][44] . Metafil Flo exhibited the lowest water sorption rate among the FCRs, but that of Metafil C was in the mid range of CCRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57][58][59][60] Osmosis droplets are observed at the transition between the adhesive layer of 1-stepSE and 2-stepER adhesives and the composite resin material. [57][58][59][60] This transition contains uncured monomers from the oxygen-inhibition layer, 48,57,58 which would have resulted in decreased DC in our study. The hydrophobic resin coat would have copolymerized with the uncured surface of the adhesive layer from the 1-step adhesive, resulting in higher DC due to the consumption of residual double bonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%