2014
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2014.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of film thickness and surface orientation on melting behaviors of copper nanofilms

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This particular melting of Cu electrode has been observed for 25 switching cycles, each cycle being characterized by Q JH = 40 µJ, according to the values used for rr, and experimental values for R on and for V reset . Since the melting of Cu occurs at 1085 °C for Cu layers thicker than 100 nm, [ 40 ] we can calculate from Equation () the product f loss × f diss using the specific heat capacities for Cu, c s = 0.385 K (g −1 °K −1 ), and for Pt c s = 0.13 J (g −1 °K −1 ), and obtain f loss × f diss = 0.063.…”
Section: Thermal Analysis Predictions Of Reram Cells’ Degradation And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular melting of Cu electrode has been observed for 25 switching cycles, each cycle being characterized by Q JH = 40 µJ, according to the values used for rr, and experimental values for R on and for V reset . Since the melting of Cu occurs at 1085 °C for Cu layers thicker than 100 nm, [ 40 ] we can calculate from Equation () the product f loss × f diss using the specific heat capacities for Cu, c s = 0.385 K (g −1 °K −1 ), and for Pt c s = 0.13 J (g −1 °K −1 ), and obtain f loss × f diss = 0.063.…”
Section: Thermal Analysis Predictions Of Reram Cells’ Degradation And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size-dependent melting temperature of Al, Cu and Ag has been studied by several groups. 51–93 The melting behavior of nanocrystalline Al was experimentally investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) by Eckert et al 54 Later, the melting points of Al at different nanoparticle radii were ascertained by Alavi and Thompson 56 using MD simulations. This method was also performed by Puri and Yang 59 to predict the melting of nanosized Al particles in the range of 2–9 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%