1995
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of flicker on perceived size and depth

Abstract: Previous research (e.g., Wong & Weisstein, 1984a, 1985 has shown that flickering stimuli appear to be more distant than nonflickering stimuli at the same physical distance. Given this relation between flicker and perceived depth, inappropriate constancy scaling theories predict that flickering stimuli should be perceived as larger than nonflickering ones. In contrast, links between flicker and motion perception suggest that flickering stimuli should be perceived as smaller than nonflickering ones. Two experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the transience of objects does not seem to interfere with form perception (Dosher, Landy, & Sperling, 1989;Todd, 1985), flickering targets appear to be farther away from the observer than nonflickering ones (Wong & Weisstein, 1984). The flickering targets also appear smaller, which suggests that the visual pathways for both motion and form are affected by flicker (Miller & Patterson, 1995). Transient stimuli also seem to disrupt size and space constancy (Macknik, Fisher, & Bridgeman, 1991;Rogowitz, 1984).…”
Section: A Time-to-contact Paradigm To Study Motion-in-depth Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the transience of objects does not seem to interfere with form perception (Dosher, Landy, & Sperling, 1989;Todd, 1985), flickering targets appear to be farther away from the observer than nonflickering ones (Wong & Weisstein, 1984). The flickering targets also appear smaller, which suggests that the visual pathways for both motion and form are affected by flicker (Miller & Patterson, 1995). Transient stimuli also seem to disrupt size and space constancy (Macknik, Fisher, & Bridgeman, 1991;Rogowitz, 1984).…”
Section: A Time-to-contact Paradigm To Study Motion-in-depth Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many factors that affect the perceived distance, including the accommodation state of the eyes, perspective field cues, and the stimulus size. [17][18][19][20][21] In the experiments, the moving target was the line shown on the LED panel. The reference was a single LED.…”
Section: Perceived Depth Caused By Binocular Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%