2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022jb025132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Fluids on Earthquakes Based on Numerical Modeling

Abstract: Understanding the physical parameters that modulate seismicity and that control the properties of earthquakes remains an ongoing challenge in earthquake mechanics. Several factors play a key role, one of which is the fault strength, which in the upper crust is determined by the product of the friction coefficient and the effective normal stress (i.e., the total normal stress minus fluid pressure). Much attention has been focused on how fault strength varies due to changes in the friction coefficient (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When faults are not fully locked during the interseismic period, stress perturbations associated with a fluid injection can cause the fault to release a portion of its energy (Ji et al, 2023). Numerical modeling by Marguin and Simpson (2023) suggest that fluid-pressure perturbations result in slow-slip events that have relatively lower stress drops, slip, and slip velocity. Another numerical modeling study by Lengliné et al (2023) suggest that increased pore pressure may stabilize seismogenic patches and lead to a transition between seismic and aseismic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When faults are not fully locked during the interseismic period, stress perturbations associated with a fluid injection can cause the fault to release a portion of its energy (Ji et al, 2023). Numerical modeling by Marguin and Simpson (2023) suggest that fluid-pressure perturbations result in slow-slip events that have relatively lower stress drops, slip, and slip velocity. Another numerical modeling study by Lengliné et al (2023) suggest that increased pore pressure may stabilize seismogenic patches and lead to a transition between seismic and aseismic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we neglect changes in porosity and permeability. Several studies have proposed that permeability changes can contribute to slow slip earthquakes and variations in fluid‐induced seismicity (Khajehdehi et al., 2022; Marguin & Simpson, 2023). To investigate the effect of permeability changes, we conduct an additional simulation with a simple permeability evolution (Text S3 and Figure S7 in Supporting Information S1) and find that permeability changes have no significant impact on our modeling results.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faults are not fully locked during the interseismic period, stress perturbations associated with a fluid injection can cause the fault to release a portion of its energy (Ji et al, 2023). Numerical modeling by Marguin & Simpson (2023) suggest that fluidpressure perturbations result in slow-slip events that have relatively lower stress drops, slip, and slip velocity. Another numerical modeling study by Lengliné et al (2023) suggest that increased pore pressure may stabilize seismogenic patches and lead to a transition between seismic and aseismic behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we neglect changes in porosity and permeability. Several studies have proposed that permeability changes can contribute to slow slip earthquakes and variations in fluid-induced seismicity (Khajehdehi et al, 2022, Marguin & Simpson, 2023. To investigate the effect of permeability changes, we conduct an additional simulation with a simple permeability evolution (Text S3 and Figure S7) and find that permeability changes have no significant impact on our modeling results.…”
Section: Simulating Pore-pressure Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is consistent with the inference from Abercrombie and Rice (2005). For shallower earthquakes, Viesca and Garagash (2015) found a change in scaling for larger earthquakes that could be modeled using dynamic weakening mechanisms such as flash heating (Rice, 2006) and thermo‐pressurization of fluids (Marguin & Simpson, 2023; Noda & Lapusta, 2013). In contrast to the inferred behavior of shallower earthquakes (Viesca & Garagash, 2015), our results suggest no strong dynamic weakening mechanisms.…”
Section: Source Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%