1988
DOI: 10.5649/jjphcs1975.14.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of food on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation, thermodynamic solubility of the drug is expected to be lower at pH 5.0 than at pH 6.5. The solubility ratio of furosemide between FeSSIF (684 μg/mL) and FaSSIF (3201 μg/mL) was reported to be 0.21 and that agrees with the negative food effect reported in the clinic [ 32 ]. It has been reported that the mucus layer present at the surface of the intestinal lining is associated with the lower microclimate pH than that of bulk phase in the intestine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation, thermodynamic solubility of the drug is expected to be lower at pH 5.0 than at pH 6.5. The solubility ratio of furosemide between FeSSIF (684 μg/mL) and FaSSIF (3201 μg/mL) was reported to be 0.21 and that agrees with the negative food effect reported in the clinic [ 32 ]. It has been reported that the mucus layer present at the surface of the intestinal lining is associated with the lower microclimate pH than that of bulk phase in the intestine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%