Influence of four soil maintenance practices on Collembola communities in a Mediterranean vineyard

Renaud, Angélique; Poinsot-Balaguer, N.; Cortet, Jérôme; Petit, Jérémy

doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2004.07.002

Cited by 32 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The treatments applied on vine plants in the different managed vineyards did not seem to affect the soil mesofauna as registered by Scalercio et al (2009) on olive groves. Conversely, the suppression of the herbicide (glyphosate formulations) application, in IPM fields in 2012, appeared to benefit the organisms living in the topsoil; this was observed by Gomez and Sagardoy (1985) and by Renaud et al (2004) on springtails.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Case study of microarthropod communities to assess soil quality in different managed vineyards

Gagnarli¹,

Goggioli²,

Tarchi³

et al. 2015

SOIL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Land use influences the abundance and diversity of soil arthropods. The evaluation of the impact of different management strategies on soil quality is increasingly sought, and the determination of community structures of edaphic fauna can represent an efficient tool. In the area of Langhe (Piedmont, Italy), eight vineyards characterized for physical and chemical properties (soil texture, soil pH, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, calcium carbonate) were selected. We evaluated the effect of two types of crop management, organic and integrated pest management (IPM), on abundance and biodiversity of microarthropods living at the soil surface. Soil sampling was carried out in winter 2011 and spring 2012. All specimens were counted and determined up to the order level. The biodiversity analysis was performed using ecological indexes (taxa richness, dominance, Shannon-Wiener, Buzas and Gibson's evenness, Margalef, equitability, Berger-Parker), and the biological soil quality was assessed with the BSQ-ar index.The mesofauna abundance was affected by both the type of management and sampling time. On the whole, a higher abundance was in organic vineyards (N = 1981) than in IPM ones (N = 1062). The analysis performed by ecological indexes showed quite a high level of biodiversity in this environment, particularly in May 2012. Furthermore, the BSQ-ar values registered were similar to those obtained in preserved soils.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Case study of microarthropod communities to assess soil quality in different managed vineyards

Gagnarli¹,

Goggioli²,

Tarchi³

et al. 2015

SOIL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besides earthworms, springtails have been studied in vineyard soils. Herbicide‐treated inter‐rows decreased springtail abundance and diversity, whereas tillage reduced only their abundance but not their diversity (Renaud, Poinsot‐Balaguer, Cortet, & Le Petit, ). Overall, tillage is known to be an important factor in affecting mycorrhizal communities in soils because it directly affects the integrity of the mycelial network (Verbruggen & Kiers, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis

Winter

Bauer

Strauß

et al. 2018

Journal of Applied Ecology

204

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the global scale, vineyards are usually managed intensively to optimize wine production without considering possible negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) such as high soil erosion rates, degradation of soil fertility or contamination of groundwater. Winegrowers regulate competition for water and nutrients between the vines and inter‐row vegetation by tilling, mulching and/or herbicide application. Strategies for more sustainable viticulture recommend maintaining vegetation cover in inter‐rows, however, there is a lack of knowledge as to what extent this less intensive inter‐row management affects biodiversity and associated ES.We performed a hierarchical meta‐analysis to quantify the effects of extensive vineyard inter‐row vegetation management in comparison to more intensive management (like soil tillage or herbicide use) on biodiversity and ES from 74 studies covering four continents and 13 wine‐producing countries.Overall, extensive vegetation management increased above‐ and below‐ground biodiversity and ecosystem service provision by 20% in comparison to intensive management. Organic management together with management without herbicides showed a stronger positive effect on ES and biodiversity provision than inter‐row soil tillage.Soil loss parameters showed the largest positive response to inter‐row vegetation cover. The second highest positive response was observed for biodiversity variables, followed by carbon sequestration, pest control and soil fertility. We found no trade‐off between grape yield and quality vs. biodiversity or other ES. Synthesis and applications. Our meta‐analysis concludes that vegetation cover in inter‐rows contributes to biodiversity conservation and provides multiple ecosystem services. However, in drier climates grape yield might decrease without irrigation and careful vegetation management. Agri‐environmental policies should therefore focus on granting subsidies for the establishment of locally adapted diverse vegetation cover in vineyard inter‐rows. Future studies should focus on analysing the combined effects of local vineyard management and landscape composition and advance research in wine‐growing regions in Asia and in the southern hemisphere.

show abstract

“…A sensibilidade de desenvolvimento dos colêmbolos é assunto de alguns trabalhos desenvolvidos com metais pesados (SON et al, 2007;SANTORUFO et al, 2012) e agrotóxicos em condição de campo (RENAUD et al, 2004;FOUNTAIN et al, 2007) e em condições de laboratório (KANG et al, 2001;PONGE et al, 2002). No entanto, são poucos os trabalhos envolvendo combustíveis e que avaliam os efeitos sobre a reprodução dos colêmbolos no solo, sejam em condição de campo ou em laboratório.…”

unclassified

Metais pesados, agrotóxicos e combustíveis: efeito na população de colêmbolos no solo

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o desenvolvimento de colêmbolos no solo com diferentes níveis de metais pesados, combustíveis e agrotóxicos em condição de laboratório. Os tratamentos foram: Cádmio (1, 10 e 100mg kg-1 de solo); Cobre (50, 500 e 5000mg kg-1 de solo); Zinco (100, 1000 e 10000mg kg-1 de solo); fungicida epoxiconazol + piraclostrobina (1 e 2L ha-1); fungicida epoxiconazol (0,75 e 1,5L ha-1); herbicida glifosato (2 e 4L ha-1); óleo lubrificante queimado (5, 50 e 100mL kg-1 solo) e óleo diesel (5, 50 e 100mL kg-1 solo) e controle. Na dose de 1mg kg-1 de Cd no solo, houve grande aumento na população de colêmbolos e o pH do solo diminuiu à medida que aumentaram as doses de Cd, Zn e Cu no solo. Na presença de combustíveis, os colêmbolos apresentaram incapacidade de reprodução, independente da dose aplicada no solo. O número de colêmbolos apresentou incremento com o aumento da dosagem de glifosato e epoxiconazol. Os metais pesados Cu e Zn têm ação negativa sobre a população de colêmbolos e somente o Cd (1mg kg-1 solo) proporciona aumento na população de colêmbolos no solo. A presença de óleo lubrificante queimado e óleo diesel no solo inibem o desenvolvimento dos colêmbolos no solo. Os agrotóxicos glifosato, epoxiconazol e epoxiconazol + piraclostrobina não influenciam negativamente sobre a população de colêmbolos no solo.

show abstract

Influence of four soil maintenance practices on Collembola communities in a Mediterranean vineyard

Cited by 32 publications

References 12 publications

Case study of microarthropod communities to assess soil quality in different managed vineyards

Case study of microarthropod communities to assess soil quality in different managed vineyards

Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta‐analysis

Metais pesados, agrotóxicos e combustíveis: efeito na população de colêmbolos no solo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About