2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of fuel on foam degradation for fluorinated and fluorine-free foams

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s • Fuel beneath an aqueous firefighting foam increases the rate of foam degradation. • Iso-octane degrades foams faster than methylcyclohexane. • Fuel enhances bubble coalescence at the interface increasing foam degradation. • Fluorinated foams degrade slower than foams with only hydrocarbon surfactants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to repulsion towards fuel, foam stability and lamella thickness are also important to reduce fuel flux through the lamellae. Surfactants can affect the thinning dynamics of lamellae, thereby affecting foam degradation directly [25]. A synergy between the fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactants contained in AFFF was shown to be important for forming stable foams, despite reduced repulsion towards fuel by the presence of hydrocarbon surfactants in the AFFF formulation [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to repulsion towards fuel, foam stability and lamella thickness are also important to reduce fuel flux through the lamellae. Surfactants can affect the thinning dynamics of lamellae, thereby affecting foam degradation directly [25]. A synergy between the fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon surfactants contained in AFFF was shown to be important for forming stable foams, despite reduced repulsion towards fuel by the presence of hydrocarbon surfactants in the AFFF formulation [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ImageJ software was used to calculate the initial, average, diameter of 300 bubbles from the digital image. The bubble diameter distribution was reported elsewhere [25]. The initial expansion ratio was determined by weighing 250 mL of foam immediately after foam generation and dividing the volume of the foam by the weight of the foam.…”
Section: Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foams were generated from the three candidate AFFF formulations using a sparging method for bench‐scale evaluations as detailed by Hinnant, Conroy, and Ananth (). Air flows through a circular sparger disc (1 cm diameter, 25–50 μm pore size) placed 3‐cm deep in the surfactant solution at a constant rate to generate bubbles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the foam stability, the authors of [16] conducted experiments to quantify the degradation of foam caused by fuel, the application of foam to liquid fuel and water (for comparison). It was found that foams without fluoride decomposed much faster than AFFF.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%