2020
DOI: 10.1177/0954406220931541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gear surface roughness on the pitting and micropitting life

Abstract: Pitting and micropitting are the two main gear rolling contact fatigue modes. It is widely accepted that micropitting will lead to pitting; however, the relationship between pitting and micropitting life needs further investigation. In this work, micropitting and pitting tests were performed on an FZG back-to-back test rig using standard FZG PT-C and GF-C gears. The gear tooth profile change due to micropitting and pitting damage was measured in situ in the gearbox using a profilometer after each test. The gea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, surface roughness also affects fatigue failure modes. Subsurface-initiated contact fatigue failure occurs when the surface roughness is small, while surface-initiated failure appears as the stress concentration near the surface caused by roughness is more prominent [46][47][48]. By introducing a function to describe near-surface failure caused by roughness, Morales-Espejel et al [49] successfully modified the L-P fatigue life model to consider the competitive failure mechanism between surface and sub-surface of bearings.…”
Section: Predicted Results Of L-p Fatigue Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, surface roughness also affects fatigue failure modes. Subsurface-initiated contact fatigue failure occurs when the surface roughness is small, while surface-initiated failure appears as the stress concentration near the surface caused by roughness is more prominent [46][47][48]. By introducing a function to describe near-surface failure caused by roughness, Morales-Espejel et al [49] successfully modified the L-P fatigue life model to consider the competitive failure mechanism between surface and sub-surface of bearings.…”
Section: Predicted Results Of L-p Fatigue Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will increase the shear stress below the surface and reduce the contact life of the parts. 45 y: Hertz contact half-width; z: distance depth from the contact surface; t yz : shear stress on a section of cylindrical roller; r 1 , r 2 : Radius of curvature of part; L: Axial length of part.…”
Section: The Example Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h y is the local film thickness on the assumption of smooth surfaces, while R a1 and R a2 are the arithmetic mean roughness values. Bergstedt et al [32] have demonstrated experimentally that the probability of micropitting is lower on a smoother surface. Clarke et al [33] and Liu et al [34] provided an overview of the results of the latest micropitting research.…”
Section: Surface Durability Of Gearsmentioning
confidence: 99%