2017
DOI: 10.4103/jdi.jdi_15_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gender and age on nasopalatine canal: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our findings, some authors have not identified any significant difference between male and female subjects 3,10,13 However, others have reported a statistically significant difference in the length of the canal between males and females where males having longer canals. 4,5,7,9,11,12,14,[16][17][18] The average AP diameter of NPC in this study was 3.69 mm with a range of 2-6 mm which was similar to the figures reported by many others in the literature 1,[3][4][5]9,12,13,17 but higher than some others 4 and lower than in some studies. 15 This variation in the diameter may be due to the different populations studied and the variations in age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to our findings, some authors have not identified any significant difference between male and female subjects 3,10,13 However, others have reported a statistically significant difference in the length of the canal between males and females where males having longer canals. 4,5,7,9,11,12,14,[16][17][18] The average AP diameter of NPC in this study was 3.69 mm with a range of 2-6 mm which was similar to the figures reported by many others in the literature 1,[3][4][5]9,12,13,17 but higher than some others 4 and lower than in some studies. 15 This variation in the diameter may be due to the different populations studied and the variations in age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is closer to the findings of others. 1,4,5,9,[11][12][13][15][16][17] Longer canals have been identified by many others, 10,14 Mean length of canal in a study conducted by Soumya et al, in 2019 3 was 18.63 ± 2.35 mm. Males in the present study had an average canal length of 13.49 mm which was longer than the females (10.99 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Panda et al [ 2 ] and Panjnoush et al [ 7 ] found no significant relationship between gender and canal morphology. Age wise no statistical differences were obtained in our study; however, Görürgöz C et al ,[ 1 ] Salemi et al ,[ 4 ] Mishra et al ,[ 22 ] and Takeshita et al [ 23 ] found statistically significant difference between the age and length of the canal. The authors found that the canal length decreases with increasing age.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Panda et al [ 2 ] and Mraiwa et al [ 13 ] found similar funnel-shaped canals more common in their study and described that such canals lead to spreading out of the IF, so depending on the angle of implant placement, there is a risk of perforating the NPC and damaging the nasopalatine nerves and arteries. However, Thakur et al ,[ 8 ] Liang et al ,[ 10 ] and Mishra et al [ 22 ] reported cylindrical-shaped NPC in their studies. In another study, Etoz and Sisman found predominance of hour-glass shaped NPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canal is present in the middle of the anterior maxillary region. It is a long slender passage and it connects the palate to the floor of the nasal cavity [1] . Canal continues in the oral cavity as a single incisive foramen posterior to the central incisor teeth and in the nasal cavity as the foramina of Stenson, which are two in number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%