2020
DOI: 10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i11/hs2011-021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Gender and Marital Status on Mobile Phone Addictive Behaviours of Students Exposed to Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies

Abstract: Influence of Gender and Marital Status on Mobile Phone Addictive Behaviours of Students Exposed to Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies 1. Introduction Mobile technology is evolving at a very fast rate and globally, there has been tremendous growth in the use of mobile phones. The mobile phone also known as the cell phone is a portable device that can be used to communicate among others over a wide area, without a physical connection to a network. They have become a necessity and popular for many people through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings herein indicate that neither cognitive therapy nor behavioral therapy being used independently was efficacious in reducing mobile phone calling addiction among university students. This finding contradicts Edjah and Ankomah (2020), whose study reported a significant impact of cognitive and behavioral therapies in the reduction of mobile phone addiction in general (a behavior that cut across the broad spectrum of various mobile phone addictive behaviors and not on the mobile phone calling addiction behavior as in the case of the present study) among students. Similarly, it also contradicts Hofmann et al's (2012) findings that cognitive therapy helps with many of life's challenges including anxiety, depression, and addiction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The findings herein indicate that neither cognitive therapy nor behavioral therapy being used independently was efficacious in reducing mobile phone calling addiction among university students. This finding contradicts Edjah and Ankomah (2020), whose study reported a significant impact of cognitive and behavioral therapies in the reduction of mobile phone addiction in general (a behavior that cut across the broad spectrum of various mobile phone addictive behaviors and not on the mobile phone calling addiction behavior as in the case of the present study) among students. Similarly, it also contradicts Hofmann et al's (2012) findings that cognitive therapy helps with many of life's challenges including anxiety, depression, and addiction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Though participants were not frequent on phone calling, 'they spent more money on calls' (M = 3.43, SD = 1.18), attended to all missed calls (M = 3.42, SD = 1.08), and 'had strong urges to use cell phone for calling' (M = 3.03, SD =1. 19). This could explain why participants were so much involved in text messaging by making it their most preferred form of communication as well as a way of staying connected with friends and loved ones.…”
Section: Students' Cell Phone Calling Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from student's cell phone use for learning purposes and leisure, it also offers them the opportunity to establish new relationships [15] and increased family relationships [18]. However, the behavioural addiction of student's use of cell phones remains a serious challenge [19]. Even though studies have been conducted on the use of mobile phones among university students in Ghana [20,21], the specific behaviours students exhibit in the use of the cell phones and the counselling implications were not key in their investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%