2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of geometry and materials on the axial and torsional strength of the head–neck taper junction in modular hip replacements: A finite element study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CoCr possesses a higher (almost double) modulus when compared with Ti6Al4V, meaning that the contact area between trunnion and femoral head under stress was smaller [30]. Even though higher rigidity was reported to reduce the amount of damage observed at the trunnion interface [30] on surfaces with comparable morphologies [31], the changes in contact pressure distribution led to higher stress intensification at the top of the trunnion which reduced the expected ultimate load during burst testing because the critical contact pressure was reached at lower applied loads [32].…”
Section: Burst-strength Test Results and Post Fracture Head Reconstrumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoCr possesses a higher (almost double) modulus when compared with Ti6Al4V, meaning that the contact area between trunnion and femoral head under stress was smaller [30]. Even though higher rigidity was reported to reduce the amount of damage observed at the trunnion interface [30] on surfaces with comparable morphologies [31], the changes in contact pressure distribution led to higher stress intensification at the top of the trunnion which reduced the expected ultimate load during burst testing because the critical contact pressure was reached at lower applied loads [32].…”
Section: Burst-strength Test Results and Post Fracture Head Reconstrumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previously developed three dimensional FE model of the head-neck junction [17], which was verified by a set of experimental results (reported in [24]), was further developed to investigate the mechanical behaviour of the junction subjected to the loads associated with six different activities of daily living: knee bending, sit to stand, stand to sit, stair up, stair down and one leg standing. It is noted that the results for walking are presented and discussed in Part 1; however, some comparisons and discussions are reported in this part.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maruyama et al. [6] performed pin-on-disc tests to study the fretting wear behaviour of a CoCr head and Although direct measurements of the mechanical environment are difficult, finite element (FE) analysis can be used to gain an understanding of the contact pressure and micro-motion throughout an activity [15][16][17]. The mechanical behaviour of the head-neck junction was investigated by Donaldson et al [18] using a stochastic finite element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanical loads can contribute to implant failure via different mechanisms such as fretting-corrosion at the head-neck junction [1,2], loosening of the acetabular cup and femoral stem interface [3], fracture due to fatigue [4], and wear of hard-on-soft or hard-on-hard bearing couples [5,6]. The mechanical loads resulting from activities of daily living induce contact forces, frictional moments, and bending moments on the implant and its interfaces [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%