Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals

Vorster, Martin; Vyver, Petrus Jacobus Van der; Paleker, Farzana

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.017

Cited by 32 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Glide path preparation can be carried out manually or using engine-driven systems designed exclusively for this purpose. The preparation of a glide path using NiTi mechanical instruments is associated with less deviation from the original root canal anatomy and reduced apical transportation when compared to manual preparation (Ajuz et al 2013, Alovisi et al 2017, Hartmann et al 2018, besides being less timeconsuming and less operator-dependent (Vorster et al 2018). For these reasons, manufacturers have shown interest in the development of glide path NiTi instruments with appropriate designs, NiTi treatments and kinematics (Serefoglu et al 2018, € Ozy€ urek et al 2018.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the bending, buckling and torsional resistance of ProGlider (PG) (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), R-Pilot (RP) (VDW, Munich, Germany) and WaveOne Gold Glider (WOGG) (Dentsply Sirona). Methodology Ninety instruments were used: 30 PG (size 0.16, .02v taper), 30 RP (size 0.125, .04 taper) and 30 WOGG (size 0.15, .02v taper). The bending resistance test was performed on 10 randomly selected instruments of each system according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. For the buckling resistance test, a loading was applied in the axial direction of each instrument using a universal test machine, with a 20 N cell and 15 mm min À1 speed, in the axial direction. When a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm occurred, the force was registered. The torsional resistance test was performed according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). Results WOGG had the lowest bending resistance, whilst RP had the highest bending resistance (P < 0.05). RP also had the highest buckling resistance, and WOGG had the lowest (P < 0.05). PG had intermediate results regarding bending and buckling resistance, with significant differences to RP and WOGG (P < 0.05). RP had the greatest torsional strength and the lowest angular deflection when compared to PG and WOGG (P < 0.05). No differences in the torsional strength and angular deflection were observed between WOGG and PG (P> 0.05). Conclusion The glide path instruments had different behaviours in term of bending, buckling and torsional resistance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For both systems the instrumentation time of the last 20 cubes decreased significantly compared to the first ones becoming comparable to the time spent by an experienced operator ( 10 , 11 , 18 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student

Conceição¹,

Ferreira²,

Braga³

et al. 2020

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim of this study was to compare the WaveOne Gold and ProTaper Next systems regarding the time spent preparing simulated canals performed by an inexperienced student. Material and Methods 0 simulated L-shaped canals were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40) and numbered in order of instrumentation. Canals were instrumented with WaveOne Gold (group 1) and ProTaper Next (group 2) systems. The effective instrumentation time and the number of instrumentation cycles were recorded. All procedures were performed by the same operator. Statistical analysis was obtained by the Mann - Whitney, Kruskal - Wallis test with significance of p <0.05. Results There were no statistically significant differences regarding the mean instrumentation time between the two instrumentation systems. The instrumentation time decreased over the experimental period, regardless of the technique used. Conclusions Through a short learning curve, an inexperienced operator can prepare simulated canals in a very predictable time. Time spent was similar in a multi-file instrument system (ProTaper Next) and a single-file system (WaveOne Gold). Key words: Dental education, endodontics, preclinical, root canal preparation, undergraduate.

show abstract

“… 16 A reduced number of failures related to instrumentation 5 and a reduction in preparation time have contributed to the growing popularity and clinical acceptability of the glide path instruments. 23 Compared with manual glide path preparation, mechanical glide path preparation seems to be less technique-sensitive, resulting in an improved preservation of the canal anatomy, fewer canal aberrations, reduced time required for shaping, and a lower incidence of postoperative pain. 4 5 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in Curved Canals

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the volume variation and maintenance of the root canal position when using the ProGlider 16.02 (PG) and the WaveOne Gold Glider 15.02 (WOGG) file systems for glide path preparation. Materials and Methods Twenty-four moderately curved mesiobuccal canals of maxil-lary first molars were selected and randomly divided into two groups: PG and WOGG. The selected teeth were scanned using microtomography before and after root canal preparation to assess centralization and linear transport at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm from the apical foramen. Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. The level of significance was 5%. Results There were no significant differences in volume variation or root canal transport (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the centralization of the root canal at 3 mm from the foramen (p < 0.05). Conclusions WOGG and PG instruments presented similar results regarding the root canal volume increase and transport. WOGG caused higher decentralization at 3 mm from the apical foramen.

show abstract

Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals

Cited by 32 publications

References 17 publications

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

Bending, buckling and torsional resistance of rotary and reciprocating glide path instruments

Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student

Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProGlider and WaveOne Gold Glider in Curved Canals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About