1988
DOI: 10.1016/0098-8472(88)90047-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of greenbug on root growth of resistant and susceptible barley genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
4

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…From around 730 nm to 900 nm, the greenbug-damaged wheat canopies had lower reßectance than undamaged wheat. This was most likely due to degenerated internal leaf structure, reduced leaf area, and stunting plants caused by greenbug feeding (Castro and Rumi 1987, Castro et al 1988, Morgham et al 1994. Spectral responses of Þeld bean leaf infected by Botrytis fabae (Malthus and Madeira 1993) and winter wheat infested by greenbug (Riedell and Blackmer 1999) showed similar patterns in reßectance shift.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From around 730 nm to 900 nm, the greenbug-damaged wheat canopies had lower reßectance than undamaged wheat. This was most likely due to degenerated internal leaf structure, reduced leaf area, and stunting plants caused by greenbug feeding (Castro and Rumi 1987, Castro et al 1988, Morgham et al 1994. Spectral responses of Þeld bean leaf infected by Botrytis fabae (Malthus and Madeira 1993) and winter wheat infested by greenbug (Riedell and Blackmer 1999) showed similar patterns in reßectance shift.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Greenbugs inject toxic salivary secretions into plant cells, which break down cell walls to facilitate feeding as they extract plant nutrients. Greenbug feeding causes signiÞcantly lowered dry weight, leaf area, aerial growth, chlorophyll content, and consequently the photosynthetic rate of barley, Hordeum vulgare L.; sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L.; and wheat (Castro et al 1988;Riedell and Blackmer 1999;Nagaraj et al 2002a,b). Furthermore, severe degenerative changes in vascular cells of susceptible wheat can be caused by greenbug feeding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is our contention that GB-feeding damage resulting in loss of chlorophyll and senescence in "assimilate source" leaves applies an additional plant stress that further depresses root dry matter accumulation and elongation at certain times during the plant developmental sequence. This contention is supported by the work of Castro et al (16) who found that greenbug damage-induced root growth reduction was less in barley genotypes that did not show leaf chlorosis under greenbug attack than in genotypes that did. …”
Section: Results and Discussion Plant Reaction To Aphid Feeding Damagementioning
confidence: 72%
“…For crop plants, studies have found genetic variation in compensatory ability (e.g., Bohn et al 1973;Ortega et al 1980;Soper et al 1984;Castro et al 1988;Dale et al 1988). However, these studies did not determine whether compensatory ability was correlated with fitness when damaged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expectation has enticed many researchers to equate compensatory ability with relative fitness when damaged (Bohn et al 1973;Ortega et al 1980;Soper et al 1984;Castro et al 1988;Dale et al 1988;Simms and Triplett The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca Fineblum and Rausher 1995;Houle and Simard 1996;Harms and Dalling 1997;Shen and Bach 1997). However, intrinsic growth rates may explain intra-populational differences in plant fitness when damaged; plants that have higher intrinsic growth rates could achieve greater size and have greater reproduction than slower growing plants, whether plants experience damage or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%