2021
DOI: 10.3390/su132212732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Groves on Daylight Conditions and Visual Performance of Users of Urban Civil Infrastructures

Abstract: The control and efficient use of daylight is a difficult task due to its seasonal and hourly variation. Although it is matter of active research in indoor lighting due to the necessity to light human tasks at any hour of the day in a sustainable way, little attention has been paid to the impact of daylight on visual performance, safety and ergonomics of citizens, especially pedestrians in urban areas. This attention is even lower when dealing with the interaction between daylight and urban groves, which is an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the important role of the light reflected in the different elements of the room [3,4] and their role in the creation of shadows [5], lack of uniformity, influence on the illuminance levels on the working plane, performance of the visual task, etc., we find that the projected installations usually do not meet the needs they were initially designed for. This influence is similar to that of groves on street lighting [6], which results in frequent disagreements between projected and measured luminance/illuminance levels and uniformity. (3) The influence of lighting on the users of the installations goes beyond visual performance to enter complex paths intimately related to hormones, which have an impact on psychological aspects of human life and performance (mood, anxiety, health, insomnia, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Due to the important role of the light reflected in the different elements of the room [3,4] and their role in the creation of shadows [5], lack of uniformity, influence on the illuminance levels on the working plane, performance of the visual task, etc., we find that the projected installations usually do not meet the needs they were initially designed for. This influence is similar to that of groves on street lighting [6], which results in frequent disagreements between projected and measured luminance/illuminance levels and uniformity. (3) The influence of lighting on the users of the installations goes beyond visual performance to enter complex paths intimately related to hormones, which have an impact on psychological aspects of human life and performance (mood, anxiety, health, insomnia, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, the aforementioned standards do not give designers many opportunities to influence these requirements: while the criteria for motorized roads (class M) include the "navigational task difficulty" criterion (albeit with limited impact on the lighting class which generally pertains to driving rather than walking), the criteria for pedestrian and low-speed areas (class P, which is applicable in such situations) are not applicable in this specific case [19]. The same happens with the coexistence of public lighting and groves in urban environments [20][21][22], and also with different kinds of traffic signals [23,24]. Both are systematically ignored by rulemaking bodies and, rather frequently, by designers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to additional energy for illumination, outdoor agriculture prevails. Different-height districts have problems with natural illumination [49,50] and winds [51][52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%