2004
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2004021-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hay quality and pasture location on performance of beef cattle grazing oats

Abstract: Heifers grazing oat pasture (OP) at two locations in Argentina, Argerich (ARG) and Pasman (PAS), were subjected to one of three different dietary supplement treatments: (1) control (CON, no supplement), (2) sorghum hay (SH), or (3) alfalfa-grass hay (AGH), all provided ad libitum in individual pens. The variables measured were: dry matter (DM) yield and composition of OP, hay intake, average daily weight gain (ADG), rumen pH and NH 3 -N, and blood mineral levels. DM availability did not limit OP intake. OP cru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6). This result was unexpected, as N fertilization is a technology scarcely applied by cow-calf farmers (Rearte and Pordomingo, 2014), while hay and oat crop are frequently used as extra feed sources for autumn-winter (Arelovich et al, 2004). Increasing forage production by N fertilizing pastures on autumn may provide some extra advantages including reducing the area for forage cropping (Pacín and Oesterheld, 2015), ecosystem services as a sink of C sequestered in soil OM beneath the grasslands (Lemaire et al, 2011), and also in some cases a free-cost extra spring growth, but the risk of N leaching would require examination (Berger et al, unpublished companion paper).…”
Section: Implications For Cow-calf Systems In Argentinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). This result was unexpected, as N fertilization is a technology scarcely applied by cow-calf farmers (Rearte and Pordomingo, 2014), while hay and oat crop are frequently used as extra feed sources for autumn-winter (Arelovich et al, 2004). Increasing forage production by N fertilizing pastures on autumn may provide some extra advantages including reducing the area for forage cropping (Pacín and Oesterheld, 2015), ecosystem services as a sink of C sequestered in soil OM beneath the grasslands (Lemaire et al, 2011), and also in some cases a free-cost extra spring growth, but the risk of N leaching would require examination (Berger et al, unpublished companion paper).…”
Section: Implications For Cow-calf Systems In Argentinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para mejorar la digestibilidad y el consumo voluntario de los forrajes de baja calidad, existen metodologías que pueden dividirse en dos grupos: las que modifican algunas características del forraje (molido. pelleteado) y las que proveen nutrientes críticos suplementarios, fundamentalmente nitrógeno, que mejora la competencia de microorganismos fibrolíticos a nivel ruminal, tornando más eficiente la utilización de los forrajes de baja calidad2 .La amonificación es uno de los tratamientos químicos utilizados para proveer nutrientes nitrogenados. Como fuentes de amoníaco se han empleado diferentes compuestos químicos entre los cuales se encuentran amonio anhidro (NH 3 ), hidróxido de amonio (NH 4 OH) y urea11 .…”
unclassified