2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of heat treatment on structure and reversal magnetization processes of Sm12.5Co66.5Fe8Cu13 alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, range (II) in literature is attributed to magnetization changes resulting from the motion of domain walls after their unpinning in multidomain grains or bowing of strongly pinned domain walls [1315]. Finally, the range (III) represents irreversible magnetization changes resulting from unpinning of domain walls [4,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, range (II) in literature is attributed to magnetization changes resulting from the motion of domain walls after their unpinning in multidomain grains or bowing of strongly pinned domain walls [1315]. Finally, the range (III) represents irreversible magnetization changes resulting from unpinning of domain walls [4,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basing on reversible component it has been found that for the initial values of applied eld, the magnetization changes are mainly resulting from the rotation of magnetization vector. In turn, the reversible changes occurring for the values of external magnetic eld close to the coercivity of the sample are attributed to bowing of strongly pinned domain walls or in motion of unpinned domain walls [2,4,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5 Another point is that the coercivity is controlled by the nucleation of reversed domain in some 2:17 type SmCo magnets with abnormal coercivity. 3,6,7 Some studies [8][9][10][11] also thought that the inter-grain exchange coupling is a significant factor to influence the coercivity of Sm(Co, Fe, Cu, Zr) z magnets. Nevertheless, all points insist that the cellular structure is responsible for the coercivity of Sm(Co, Fe, Cu, Zr) z magnets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 The annealing process applied to these materials leads to the decomposition of the SmCo 7 phase into more stable structures, composed of the SmCo 5 and Sm 2 Co 17 phases. [6][7][8] One of the most popular methods for determining the reversal-magnetization process is an analysis of recoil loops. Reversal magnetization in multiphase, nanocomposite permanent magnets, such as annealed Sm 12.5 Fe 8 Co 66.5 Si 2 Cu 11 ribbons, is very complex and often described with more than one type of process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%