Crop Safeners for Herbicides 1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-332910-3.50008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Herbicide Safeners on Herbicide Metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, NA appeared to enhance the GST activity of wheat seedlings, in contrast to another report (Edwards and Cole 1996). NA thus induced the same type of effect in wheat as in maize and sorghum (Gronwald 1989). In addition, the protein content of shoots increased (Table 1).…”
Section: Isolation Of the Total Complement Of Gstscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…On the other hand, NA appeared to enhance the GST activity of wheat seedlings, in contrast to another report (Edwards and Cole 1996). NA thus induced the same type of effect in wheat as in maize and sorghum (Gronwald 1989). In addition, the protein content of shoots increased (Table 1).…”
Section: Isolation Of the Total Complement Of Gstscontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Applied to seeds either prior to planting or directly to the soil together with the herbicide, safeners reduce the phytotoxicity of the herbicide through at least one of the following three mechanisms: (1) decreased uptake or translocation of the herbicide, (2) competitive binding with the herbicide at the active site of the cognate enzyme(s), and (3) increased herbicide metabolism (Hatzios 1983). Although exceptions have been reported, the majority of research in this area suggests that enhancement of herbicide metabolic activity is the predominant mechanism of safener action (reviewed in Gronwald 1989;Hatzios 1991).…”
Section: Regulation Of Plant P450 Expression By Herbicides and Herbicmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it is surprising that GST-M activity continued to increase at 10 and 100 pM benoxacor, because these concentrations did not provide protection any greater than did 1 p~ benoxacor (Table I). If we assume that safening activity is due primarily to induction of GST activity, as indicated in studies of the mode of action of benoxacor (Kreuz et al, 1989;Viger et al, 1991b) and other safeners (Gronwald et al, 1987;Gronwald, 1989;Fuerst and Lamoureux, 1992), there is a need to explain why further increases in GST-M titer did not lead to greater protection. Two explanations are suggested: (a) The inhibition of growth that was seen even at very high benoxacor concentrations was the result of inhibition of growth by metolachlor during germination or emergence, before maximal induction of GST-M by benoxacor; altematively, (b) at such high metolachlor concentrations, further increases in GST-M titer did not completely prevent metolachlor from reaching shoot meristematic regions.…”
Section: Effect Of Benoxacor Concentration In Growth Medium On Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%