INFLUENCE OF HISTAIMINE H₁ AND H₂‐RECEPTOR BLOCKERS ON SYMPATHETIC VASODILATOR AND VASOCONSTRICTOR RESPONSES IN CANINE PAW

Abstract

1 Vasodilator responses to histamine, bradykinin and sympathetic nerve stimulation were elicited in the perfused paw of dogs treated with bretylium (15-20 mg/kg) and atropine. The H2 -receptor blocking agent, burimamide, when administered in the dose of 5 mg/kg intravenously and 4 mg intra-arterially did not depress significantly these vasodilator responses. The subsequent administration of tripelennamine in the dose of 2.5-5 mg/kg intravenously and 4 mg intra-arterially produced a significant blockade of the response to histamine and reduced the sustained vasodilator response to nerve stimulation. 2 In guanethidine-treated dogs, tripelennamine administered in the same dose following burimamide produced a blockade of the respone to histamine comparable to'that in the bretylium experiments, but decreased only the sustained vasodilator response to stimulation at 1 Hz. When the order of administration of the antihistamines was reversed in another group of guanethidine-treated dogs, tripelennamine had only a slight blocking effect on the response to histamine and did not affect the responses to nerve stimulation. Burimamide exerted a significant blocking effect on the response to histamine, but not to nerve stimulation. Another H2-receptor blocking agent, metiamide, when given after tripelennamine, also had a marked blocking effect on the response to histamine and almost abolished the vasodilator response to 4-methylhistamine, an H2-agonist. Nevertheless, even in the presence of this profound histamine blockade, the sustained vasodilator response to nerve stimulation remained unchanged. 3 In another group of experiments vasoconstrictor responses to exogenous noradrenaline and sympathetic stimulation were initially depressed by burimamide and later returned to control values. Tripelennamine increased these responses by its uptake blocking action. 4 It is concluded that the sustained vasodilator response is not antagonized by a specific antihistaminic action. The decrease in the sustained vasodilator response produced by antihistamines is probably attributable to potentiation of a residual adrenergic vasoconstrictor effect not completely blocked by bretylium.