2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(02)00108-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of housing on weanling horse behavior and subsequent welfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
76
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
76
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Group-living animals show a greater amount of behavioural patterns than individual stabled animals, due to the possibility of interactions (Waran, 2001). The foals in this study had an amount of social contacts and locomotion activities greater than the group of housed animals studied by Heleski et al (2002) in comparison with single housed foals, suggesting the preservation of welfare regardless of the diet fed. The time budget of foals showed behavioural occurrences similar to the ones observed for a daytime period in adult horses of mixed breed when housed in groups (Yarnell et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group-living animals show a greater amount of behavioural patterns than individual stabled animals, due to the possibility of interactions (Waran, 2001). The foals in this study had an amount of social contacts and locomotion activities greater than the group of housed animals studied by Heleski et al (2002) in comparison with single housed foals, suggesting the preservation of welfare regardless of the diet fed. The time budget of foals showed behavioural occurrences similar to the ones observed for a daytime period in adult horses of mixed breed when housed in groups (Yarnell et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Compared with the individual stabling, group housing allows more natural behaviours and contacts with conspecifics, diminishing the stress level of individuals, and improving well-being conditions (Yarnell et al, 2015). Furthermore, the possibility of moving twice a week into a paddock (Mantovani et al, 2014), in addition to group housing, has surely provided advantages for animal welfare (Heleski et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When paired with a peer, foals exhibit less stress reactions but aggressions do arise and can lead to injuries (Hoffmann et al, 1995). Other practices, such as the progressive retrieval of mares from the group (Holland et al, 1996), keeping foals at pasture in groups (Heleski et al, 2002) or still more so introducing adults with the weanlings (Henry et al, in press) all lead to lowered expressions of stress, including lowered levels of aggression. Space, dispersed resources (grass) and social diversity may help foals go through this forced and artificial separation from the dam without developing higher levels of aggressiveness.…”
Section: The Mother-young Bondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction With their ambiguous status of farm, leisure, sport and « pet » animals, horses are often exposed to different types of constraints that can alter their welfare, such as social or sensory deprivation (Cooper et al, 2000;Heleski et al, 2002) and feeding and spatial restrictions (Nicol et al, 2000). Moreover, horses have repeated and varied interactions with humans that lead to the establishment of a relationship which valence will depend on how these interactions were perceived by both interlocutors and may influence their welfare state (Fureix et al, 2009;Hausberger et al, 2008 pour revue).…”
Section: Application Improving Management Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mason 1991; Mc Greevy 1995). They reveal feeding (Nicol et al, 2000), spatial (Cooper et al, 2000), social (Heleski et al, 2002) restrictions or even inappropriate working conditions . Other sanitary indicators are also obvious such as wounds (Cook 2002(Cook , 2003Popescu & Diugan 2013) or limping (Burn et al, 2010) whereas major problems such as back disorders remain underestimated because of their lack of clear visibility (Jeffcott et al, 1999).…”
Section: Application Improving Management Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%