2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of humeral head material on wear performance in anatomic shoulder joint arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both wear results were in the same range as the wear rate reported by Wirth et al 25 with conventional UHWMPE. Comparing the results from Wirth et al 25 and Mueller et al, 52 it is evident that cross-linking was the most relevant factor to reduce polyethylene wear. Components studied by Mueller et al 52 exhibited a radial mismatch of 8 mm and 12 mm in A/P and I/S directions, respectively, but both ceramic and metal humeral heads were spherical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both wear results were in the same range as the wear rate reported by Wirth et al 25 with conventional UHWMPE. Comparing the results from Wirth et al 25 and Mueller et al, 52 it is evident that cross-linking was the most relevant factor to reduce polyethylene wear. Components studied by Mueller et al 52 exhibited a radial mismatch of 8 mm and 12 mm in A/P and I/S directions, respectively, but both ceramic and metal humeral heads were spherical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The UHMWPE wear rate found in the present study was considerably reduced compared with wear rates reported in other shoulder in vitro studies. 14,25,43,[52][53][54][55] Mueller et al 52 reported significantly reduced wear rates for a ceramic humeral head against conventional UHMWPE glenoid compared with a conventional CoCr humeral head against the same glenoid component in an anatomic shoulder wear test. However, both wear results were in the same range as the wear rate reported by Wirth et al 25 with conventional UHWMPE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be related to glenoid or humeral component malposition, increased mechanical stress on the glenoid, increased friction between components, or the volume of polyethylene particles generated by the head-polyethylene articulation. 21 Mueller et al 23 used a force-controlled joint simulator to assess the polyethylene wear characteristics influenced by ceramic and metal humeral heads. They showed that the humeral heads made of ceramic material provided a significantly reduced wear rate compared with the metallic humeral heads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mueller et al, 23 in an in vitro study, used a forcecontrolled joint simulator to assess the polyethylene wear characteristics influenced by ceramic and metal humeral heads. They showed that the humeral heads made of ceramic material provided a significantly reduced wear rate of the polyethylene compared with the metallic humeral heads.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a wear study on shoulder implants, particles were isolated according to an established protocol . Three SEM images were used for this study to compare the Particleanalyzer_HD, the open source software ImageJ (1.49, National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda, MD, USA) and the commercially available Leica QWin (V3 Lite, Wetzlar, Germany) regarding particle number, ECD, AR and R. As recommended in the ASTM the magnification was set to 10,000×, because the majority of the particles had a size between 0.2 and 1.0 μm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%