2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0435-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hydrophyte abundance on the spatial distribution of zooplankton in selected lakes in Greece

Abstract: Submerged hydrophyte vegetation consists of a highly important biotic component of maintaining lake ecosystems towards a ''clear water'' ecological status. Aquatic macrophytes are well known to play a significant multidimensional role in lakes by competing with phytoplankton growth, stabilising sediment and offering refuge to fishes, macro-invertebrates and littoral zooplankton, amongst others. Zooplanktons that are associated with macrophyte beds, in particular, may act as a positive feedback mechanism that c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Figures 4 and 5). These changes were confirmed by field observations during 2006-2008 where, apart from the reed bed a diverse submerged macrophytic community was identified [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…(Figures 4 and 5). These changes were confirmed by field observations during 2006-2008 where, apart from the reed bed a diverse submerged macrophytic community was identified [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…4e). During this period, charophytes disappeared from the lake and Potamogeton pectinatus increased in abundance (Stefanidis & Papastergiadou, 2010). Between 1987 and1988, charophytes occurred in 33% of the sampling plots, while Potamogeton pectinatus and Myriophyllum spicatum were found in 38 and 52% of the total sampling plots, respectively (Papastergiadou & Babalonas, 1993).…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, phosphate, total phosphorus, carbonate, bicarbonate and chlorophyll-a concentrations were determined following the analytical procedure of APHA (APHA, 1992). For the quantification of the zooplankton, subsamples were collected within the macrophyte beds using a tube and were pooled into a vessel in order to form an integrated sample of approximately 10 L (KuczyƄska-Kippen, 2003;Stefanidis and Papastergiadou, 2010). A volume of 6-7 L was finally concentrated through a 50 ”m net and fixed immediately with Lugol's solution.…”
Section: > Field Samplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rotifera and Cladocera were counted using a Sedgewick-Rafter cell and were identified at species or genus level. Aquatic macrophyte abundance was visually estimated according to a five point scale (1: rare, 2: common, 3: frequent, 4: abundant, 5: dominant, Stefanidis and Papastergiadou, 2010). Frequencies of occurrence were calculated for each taxon at the two different time periods and the taxa were classified into the following categories: rare (<0.25% of quadrats), occasional (0.26-1% of quadrats), common (1-5% of quadrats), abundant (5-20% of quadrats) and very abundant (>20% of quadrats) .…”
Section: > Field Samplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%